SB1062 “Right to Discriminate” bill will likely be vetoed by AZ governor

February 25, 2014
Anderson Cooper looks like he believes it.
Anderson Cooper looks like he’s about 2 seconds from a face-palm for the entire ten minute interview.

Last week, Arizona passed a disturbingly dense State Senate bill called SB1062. This is a bill that it’s authors have dubbed the “religious freedom” bill, but which is really a free pass for Arizonans to legally discriminate against anyone they feel like on ostensibly religious grounds.

The bill’s authors pedantically claim that the bill is exclusively intended to protect the right for Arizonan’s to exercise their religion, a right that Arizona state senator, SB1062 bill supporter, and possible talking tree stump Capt. Al Melvin could not convince Anderson Cooper last night was even in danger in the state of Arizona ( video after the jump).

This is the full video of Capt. Melvin’s hilarious, gut-wrenchingly awkward interview with Anderson Cooper, which is totally worth the watch if you are masochistic but really want to see how much (re: little) thought has gone into the making of SB1062.

Part 2 of the interview is available here, and includes reaction from NYU law prof Kenji Yoshino. Some highlights:

  • Al Melvin is against discrimination.
  • Al Melvin doesn’t think this bill would protect discrimination.
  • Al Melvin will not comment on whether firing a person based on sexual orientation constitutes discrimination.
  • Al Melvin doesn’t believe anyone in Arizona discriminates against anyone (newsflash: SB 1070).

Not surprisingly, virtually the rest of the country has focused the spotlight on Arizona and the inanity of their “Right to Discriminate” bill, which in practice would protect the right for any business owner to use loosely defined religious grounds to discriminate against anyone — from gays, to Muslims, to other non-Christians, to unwed mothers, to divorcees, to women seeking the morning-after pill, to any group or identity that any religious text or practice has  ever condemned. More damningly, the bill protects the right of Arizonans to practice their religion, but also protects the more dubious “right” of Arizonans to never have their religious beliefs challenged by exposure to contradictory evidence, like being forced to observe the humanity of gay Americans.

SB1062, and its sister bill HB 2153, have passed the Arizona Senate and House, and are currently on Arizona Governor Jan Brewer’s desk, where she must make the decision to either sign or veto the bill. Thankfully, a growing deluge of Americans have been applying pressure on Arizona and Governor Brewer asking her to veto the bill. Prominent LGBT activists, including renowned actor George Takei, who owns property in Arizona, have vowed to boycott the state. 66,000 users have signed a petition calling for a vetoBusiness owners in Arizona are speaking out against SB1062, worried about its impact on state tourism. Three of the GOP state senators who voted in favour of the bill — Sen. Steve Pierce (R-Prescott), Sen. Bob Worsley (R-Mesa), and senate majority whip Sen. Adam Driggs (R-Phoenix) — have had a change of heart, and are now urging the governor to veto.

And, last night, my esteemed friend Mike Bryan, who runs Arizona’s foremost politics blog (Blog for Arizona, @BlogforArizona), and who is an oracle of Arizona politics, predicted that Governor Brewer would veto the bill. In the full-text of his post, Mike wrote:

SB1062 is dead

Stick a fork in Arizona’s ill-conceived and mean-spirited anti-gay legislation, which is making a stink throughout the national media. Arizona’s de facto Governor has pronounced it dead: Chuck Coughlin has publicly announced his advice to de jure Governor Brewer to veto the bill. The rest is merely sound and fury, signifying nothing.

It turns out that Governor Brewer’s chief advisor, Chuck Coughlin, has joined the chorus calling for Governor Brewer to veto. And since Arizona insiders in-the-know know the influence Coughlin has on virtually all of Brewer’s decisions, Coughlin’s statement is as good as a prediction that the bill is dead.

So take heart, Arizonans. Arizona may be a politically back-water place where racial profiling is considered good state law, where the state coffers are bankrupt but taxes still won’t be raised, where Minutemen are considered state heroes instead of lawless vigilantes, and where a talking slab of granite like Capt Al. Melvin can legitimately consider a gubernatorial run, but it looks like even Arizona’s not stupid enough to sign into law a bill so flagrantly unconstitutional it would never make it past its first federal court challenge.

Act Now! Keep the pressure up. Here’s another link to that petition asking Governor Brewer to veto SB1062!

Did you like this content? Please consider becoming a patron of Reappropriate and get exclusive access to the brand new Reappropriate vlog!

  • Daniel

    Now that’s what I call an ass kicking. Go Anderson Cooper. Al Melvin is completely clueless. I about hit the floor giggling during the whole sequence of “There is no Discrimination in Arizona”. I am glad to hear this garbage bill will likely get shot down. There is enough hate floating around in this country without legalizing it.

  • Jerry

    In addition to all the LGBT Asian Americans this would affect, let’s not forget that interracial marriage was once heavily opposed on religious grounds too. If this law passes, a baker could legally refuse to provide a cake for an interracial wedding. Considering we still live in a world where a Louisiana judge refused to grant a marriage license to an interracial couple and plurality of GOP voters in Mississippi want interracial marriage illegal, is it really that hard to imagine?

  • Absolutely and thanks for pointing that out, Jerry! This bill goes far beyond gay Americans, to virtually any American whose identity was ever targeted for religious reasons. I do think that critics of this bill have missed out in emphasizing that point.

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.


Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.