BREAKING: California Governor Signs AAPI Data Disaggregation Bill Into Law

September 26, 2016
California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, author of The Ahead Act (AB1726) which would expand data disaggregation for AAPIs in California, speaks to supporters at a rally earlier this year. (Photo Credit: Twitter)
California State Assemblymember Rob Bonta, author of The Ahead Act (AB1726) which would expand data disaggregation for AAPIs in California, speaks to supporters at a rally earlier this year. (Photo Credit: Twitter)

Following years of tireless advocacy work by AAPI advocacy groups, California has signed a critical data disaggregation bill into law.

AB1726 (also called “The AHEAD Act”) was introduced before the California Legislature early this year by bill author Assemblyman Rob Bonta. Recognizing that most state and federal data generally lump all members of the nearly 50 ethnic groups that comprise the AAPI community into a single monolithic category or disaggregate by only a handful of ethnic identifiers, the bill called for the expanded disaggregation of state public health and higher education data to include at least ten more ethnic categories for AAPIs. Those new ethnic options — which include checkboxes for those who identify as Bangladeshi, Hmong, Indonesian, Malaysian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Taiwanese, Thai, Fijian and Tongan — were consistent with what is currently available via the National Census.

Meanwhile, the lack of disaggregated data renders invisible several achievement disparities — including increased incidence of certain treatable diseases and/or reduced education access — that disproportionately impact certain AAPI ethnic groups over others. Without the capacity to draw awareness to those inequities, no culturally- or linguistically-specific resources are devoted to addressing them.

The AHEAD Act was designed to take the first step towards helping the thousands of Asian American and Pacific Islander Californians who are currently underserved by state and federal services.

ctsjcruxgaashxiThe AHEAD Act was the second iteration of an earlier data disaggregation bill that had passed the California Legislature with near unanimous support in 2015; that bill was inexplicably vetoed by Governor Jerry Brown last year. This year’s AB1726 emerged out of discussion between AAPI advocates — including Assemblyman Bonta, as well as groups such as SEARAC, APIAHF, CPEHN and EPIC — and the governor’s office in hopes that a new version of the bill could be drafted that might satisfy the concerns of all parties.

Upon introduction, AB1726 immediately garnered the same strong multiracial and bipartisan support as earlier attempts. 120 California-area organizations formally supported the bill, as did 35 national AAPI organizations who are associated with the National Council of Asian Pacific Americans network; Chinese for Affirmative Action also offered their approval of the bill. The bill was also strongly supported by the entities that oversee California’s colleges and universities, who were among those who would be required to implement the bill’s new mandates.

However, Asian American opponents of affirmative action launched a confounding effort to oppose AB1726, arguing that AB1726 was a “backdoor” to affirmative action in the state. Organizing predominantly through Chinese-language social media outlets such as WeChat, opponents staged rallies and published memes calling the bill “racist” and likening it to the early days of Germany’s Holocaust. Republican California State Senator Bob Huff lead the charge against AB1726, and the bill also received dubious opposition from Ro Khanna, a Democrat running to unseat Representative Mike Honda.

The arguments against AB1726 were baffling; I still struggle to understand how data disaggregation could be a controversial topic, and I, moreover, fail to see how the AHEAD Act is anything like Chinese Exclusion, Japanese American incarceration, or German concentration camps. Nonetheless, the AHEAD Act was amended earlier this summer to remove official requirements on California’s collection of higher education data.

The amended AHEAD Act, which focuses now primarily on the collection of public health data, passed both the California State Senate and the California Assembly in late August, with only a single nay vote recorded against the bill across both floor votes. Even former opponent State Senator Huff cast a vote to approve the measure. But, it was still possible that Governor Brown might again veto the bill.

Those fears were allayed over the weekend when AB1726 was among over thirty bills signed into law by Governor Brown.

This, alone, is a victory. But in addition, there is evidence that California’s colleges and universities — in recognition of the importance of ethnically disaggregated AAPI data — will work with bill authors to voluntarily collect more nuanced and illuminating data regarding Asian American and Pacific Islanders, even though the bill was amended to remove their mandate that they do so. Writes AHEAD Act author Assemblymember Rob Bonta in his Facebook post reacting to the bill’s signing:

We received great news today– Governor Brown signed my AHEAD Act (AB 1726) which provides for Asian Pacific Islander (API) disaggregated data! The AHEAD Act addresses a very important need within our API communities. Many ethnic subgroups within the API community are falling behind with respect to health outcomes and our policy makers haven’t had detailed, accurate data to address these disparities. AB 1726 requires the state health department to disaggregate data for specified ethnic subgroups. The data to be collected by AB 1726 will give the state a better understanding of the needs of each of these API subgroups. And in addition, UC and CSU, working closely with our office, have committed to releasing disaggregated educational data they are collecting to help us understand API admissions, completion, and graduation rates. I strongly believe that having good data will help us create better policy, and help us uplift ALL of our API communities! Thanks for everyone’s support on this!

This blog wants to thank all the many activists and  elected officials who courageously invested their time and energy into helping the many underserved and struggling Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders who too often languish, invisible and unheard. Passage of AB1726 brings California a step closer to ensuring that all Californians — and particularly, all AAPI Californians — finally count.

Did you like this content? Please consider becoming a patron of Reappropriate and get exclusive access to the brand new Reappropriate vlog!

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.


Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.