Carly Fiorina, Bobby Jindal, Rick Santorum, and how the GOP will fail in their courtship of the AAPI vote

May 28, 2015
Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina
Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina

It should come as no surprise that the progressive expansion of America’s non-White populations has left the Grand Old Party in a turmoil. In both 2008 and 2012, Republicans lost the Black, Latino, and Asian votes by wide margins, and most demographic projections predict that in the aggregate, non-White people will outnumber Whites in America by the year 2042 or sooner. Thus, the GOP is in a scramble to develop a loyal non-White voting block in the next decade in order to retain their political power over Democrats.

For many conservatives, the voting block most vulnerable to partisan Republican appeals is the Asian American community. Rooting their hopes largely on model minority stereotypes of Asian Americans, conservatives like Bill O’Reilly view Asian Americans as “not liberal… by nature” because we are “industrious and hard-working”.

To be fair, AAPI are less likely to identify as either Democrat or Republican, with a large segment of our voters preferring to register with an “independent” party affiliation. And certainly, with some Asian American ethnic groups well-represented as small business owners and in the upper echelons of the private sector, the GOP’s conventional pro-business platform should be appealing. Indeed, in the early 1990’s, Asian Americans were evenly split between those who voted George H.W. Bush and his Democratic opponent. Yet, 25 years later, between two-thirds and three-quarters of Asian voters voted with the Democratic party in the last two general elections.

The Asian Republican Coalition, launched in 2014.
The Asian Republican Coalition, launched in 2014.

In the last few years, the GOP has launched a series of concerted outreach efforts aimed specifically at attracting unaffiliated Asian American voters to the Right. Yet, Democrats need not yet despair: these transparent efforts have mostly revealed how deeply out-of-touch the Republican party is with regard to the Asian American community.

Last year, the Asian Republican Coalition was launched as an ostensibly independent organization. Its sole mission is to focus on winning over the Asian American vote. From the outset, the ARC reinforces Perpetual Foreigner stereotypes by failing to distinguish between Asian and Asian American interests — even the name of the coalition alone emphasizes “Asian” over “Asian American”. At the press conference held to announce the ARC’s formation, most of the coalition’s membership appeared to be White and when the ARC announced its slate of Republican endorsements, only one — Rhode Island’s Allan Fung — was Asian American. The group’s chairman and the lone Asian face in the group photograph above, Hong Kong-based investment banker John Ying. Meanwhile, the group’s vice chairman is Thomas Britt, the former Asia (as in Asia Asia) Finance Chairman of the RNC. He defended the group’s membership by explaining the ARC’s exceptionally broad definition of who constitutes an Asian American. Speaking to Vice last year:

“We have a very broad definition of what constitutes the Asian American community,” says Britt, who is white. “The Asian Republican Coalition is open to all Americans, including Asian Americans and those of us like me who are not ethnically Asian but have spent twenty years living in Hong Kong.”

The issue goes deeper than the clumsiness of the ARC. The Republican Party has thus far failed to address one potentially fatal contradiction: the GOP wants to court a community defined entirely as a shared racial identity, yet they are a party that openly rejects the very notion of identity politics. They want to win the Asian (American) vote while they simultaneously dismiss the idea that Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are, should be, and perceive ourselves as a culturally, racially and politically distinct segment of the voting public united for a common AAPI cause.

For much of its recent history, the Grand Old Party has rooted itself in xenophobic racism. It may be too late to turn back now, even though the Republican Party has realized that disrespecting and dehumanizing people of colour is no longer a political investment that can return any meaningful dividends. And so, the GOP finds itself a party that must speak the language of identity politics while it embraces a philosophy that rejects it.

The Party’s dissonant ignorance of that which brings together minority communities is evident in the way that Republican candidates clumsily stumble their way through questions of racial identity, including with regard to AAPI voters: they literally have no idea who AAPI are, let alone how to talk to us in ways that aren’t dismissive and offensive. Recently, Rick Santorum (who announced his presidential candidacy yesterday) described Asian Americans as “yellow” at a campaign stop in northern Iowa, before exasperatedly correcting himself. “I’m talking about black, brown, yellow — whatever, or whatever it is, Asian?” said Santorum while a campaign aide frantically downplayed the gaffe to reporters. Meanwhile, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal declared himself “tired of the hyphenated Americans” before going on to call for an end to “African-Americans”, “Indian-Americans” and “Asian-Americans”.

Republicans typically ground their discussion of race in a post-racial colour-blind dream, but as many people of colour — including Asian Americans — understand, this sounds less like sincerity and more like stump-speeching. Santorum might begin a sentence saying that skin colour shouldn’t matter, but when he concludes that same sentence by referring to Asian Americans as “yellow”, we know that it still does. Jindal might proudly identify as just “American”, but here Jindal draws a sharp line between himself and the rest of the Asian American community. The vast majority of Asian Americans in 2012 identify by their ethnicity (e.g. “Filipino” or “Filipino American”), indicating that we place significant emphasis on our distinct cultural and ethnic heritage. While only 30% of us identify with a more pan-ethnic term “Asian” or “Asian American”, a mere 3% of us would reject any ethnic or racial identifier and use just the term “American”.

Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal

The Republicans’ failure to grasp basic identity politics also leads to other embarrassing gaffes that compromise their efforts to conduct outreach to Asian American voters. Earlier this week, underdog candidate Carly Fiorina launched into an anti-Chinese tirade that could only be interpreted as abhorrently racist.

“I have been doing business in China for decades, and I will tell you that yeah, the Chinese can take a test, but what they can’t do is innovate,” she said. “They are not terribly imaginative. They’re not entrepreneurial, they don’t innovate, that is why they are stealing our intellectual property.”

This kind of explicitly racist stereotyping can only reinforce the GOP’s existing public image as the party of racial intolerance. Consequently, no matter how much minorities might actually value lower taxes and smaller government, we can never vote with a party that so deeply misunderstands who we are as people that this kind of disrespectful speech is commonplace.

Until the GOP figures out a way to excise this kind of rampant racism from their rank-and-file members, all efforts to court the Asian vote are (and should be) doomed to failure.

The Republicans’ more tangible recent efforts to organize Asian voters have been impressive, if also misguided. The Republican anti-affirmative action lobby has done an impressive job whipping up hysterical fear in California and empowering new efforts out of our community to end race-conscious college admissions nationwide. These initiatives serve in part to build the idea that the Republican party is more sensitive to the concerns of Asian American voters. Of course, Republican strategists have failed to consider that the vast majority of Asian Americans oppose the vocal anti-affirmative action activists in our midst; more than two-thirds of us support affirmative action and don’t think it hurts our chances in college admissions.

But, before Democrats get too comfortable, we must also remember that Republicans do not have a monopoly on racism, anti-Asian stereotyping, and sinophobia; Democrats are fully capable of being racist, too. Sure, Democrats are more facile with the language of identity politics; our Party, for example, comfortingly acknowledges the ethnic and racial diversity of the AAPI community in a way that Republicans do not. As a party, Democrats support a platform of inclusiveness that not only tolerates AAPI, but advances social programs that benefit many within our community.

Yet, last year, a local Kentucky Democratic operative, for example, tweeted a storm of blatantly racist and misogynist tweets against Former Secretay of Labor Elaine Chao. So long as such incidents are generally overlooked by the Democratic Party establishment, the Left’s appeal to Asian Americans should never be considered secure.

More substantively, the Left can ill-afford to continue specifically overlooking AAPI voters, and the big-ticket items that propel us to the ballot box. Albeit more sophisticated than Republican efforts, the Democratic Party’s outreach to the AAPI community remains nonetheless inadequate. Where are the Democratic Party townhalls for Asian American voters to address our key issues? Where are the in-language resource sheets and voter guides? Where are the commitments to help elect staunchly Democratic Asian American representatives? Where are leftists volunteering to help out the 135+ AAPI organizations who took a courageous stand in support of affirmative action this past month?

Sure, the White House just held a major and historic summit on the AAPI community earlier this month, but one day of panel discussions and workshops does not make up for decades of political ambivalence.

Republicans are face-palming-ly bad at speaking about or to AAPI voters. But, so long as the Democrats are allowing the GOP to speak to the AAPI community in a vacuum devoid of similar courtship from the Left, Republicans will make ill-deserved inroads.

Meanwhile, Democrats have a chance to show Republicans how its done: with respect and tolerance. So come on, Democrats, where you at?

Did you like this content? Please consider becoming a patron of Reappropriate and get exclusive access to the brand new Reappropriate vlog!

  • pzed

    I disagree with … well almost everything you post politically these days, but this is hard to disagree with this post. Fiorina must really not give a shit about the Asian American vote if she’s campaigning on that message. As little as I think our interests align with other minorities, when the GOP goes out of its way to spit on Asian interests I can’t think of much of a reason to go out and for them.

  • 1maybeso

    A couple of things.
    1. Not everyone who is considered Asian American sees their interests aligned under one AAPI political umbrella. And Republicans are fair to recognize that.

    2. Many Asian Americans are against affirmative action. Even if 60% are for it, that is 40% that are against it. And it will be even more problematic when Hispanic voters quickly become 40-50% of the population in the next few decades and yet are still receiving massive affirmative action help. I suspect it will squeeze Asian Americans and Caucasians incredibly.

    3. I do not like Carly but she has a point about China. The Chinese have been blatantly stealing IP from this country and many other countries through out the world, such as Japan and Germany, for decades now. Maybe instead of being mad at her for pointing this out, you should condemn China for actually stealing.

  • RizingZan

    “1. Not everyone who is considered Asian American sees their interests
    aligned under one AAPI political umbrella. And Republicans are fair to
    recognize that.”

    Although that is true, Jenn is attacking the methodology of how they are trying to swing the vote. Most of us are tired of the reinforcement of the “model minority.” Stereotypes are stereotypes even if they seem “helpful.” The GOP, in this specific case at least, essentially wants Asian Americans to pretend that they are white people. They are using a color blind methodology in which we can “forget” about being minorities and/or try to think that we are better than other people of color.

    “2. Many Asian Americans are against affirmative action. Even if 60% are
    for it, that is 40% that are against it. And it will be even more
    problematic when Hispanic voters quickly become 40-50% of the population
    in the next few decades and yet are still receiving massive affirmative
    action help. I suspect it will squeeze Asian Americans and Caucasians
    incredibly.”

    You read the graph wrong or did not see it at all. 69% are for it, 18% are neutral or have no opinion, and 13 % outright oppose it. You’re turning this into Asian and White versus everyone else. I suggest you do not do that because that’s not really the case. Affirmative Action, for Asian Americans, has been and will always be about, specifically, Asian Americans versus White Americans. We are not “threatened” by Black people or Latino people. Affirmative Action is not just about race, but social status. Although Asian Americans are equal to White people in SES, the standard deviation is MUCH greater. We look at Chinese, Filipino, and Japanese Americans doctors yet we ignore the Hmong, Cambodians, Laotians, and a good chunk of Korean and Vietnamese Americans. Oh and Hispanic is not a race.

    “3. I do not like Carly but she has a point about China. The Chinese have
    been blatantly stealing IP from this country and many other countries
    through out the world, such as Japan and Germany, for decades now. Maybe
    instead of being mad at her for pointing this out, you should condemn
    China for actually stealing.”

    You missed the point. Carly’s statement was a pretty blatant ad hominem statement on Chinese people of all nationalities. Just because there are some Chinese businesspeople who steal IP does not mean that suddenly all Chinese are unimaginative or not innovative. To be logically sound, the best she could do is talk about how (some) Chinese businesspeople are unimaginative or not innovative.

  • Myra Esoteric

    This is why I’m getting back into Libertarianism

  • 1maybeso

    The comment was not racist.
    If she had made this comment about the British, you would not have called it racist against all
    White people. It is clear from the context of the conversation that she is not making a statment about Asians in general but about the country of China as a collective economic unit. Meanwhile, while we are so worried about being PC, China is trying to steal every island it can from its neighbors and hack into our government employee databases. China is not some delicate flower whose honor must be defended. China is a threat to the US and its neighbors militarily, economically, environmentally, and technologically.

  • Myra Esoteric

    She did not specify Mainland China. Not all Chinese people are from Mainland China. Some are from other municipalities such as Hong Kong, Singapore and Taiwan.

    It’s like saying Jews instead of Israel. Not all Jews are from Israel. You can blame Israel but when you blame Jews obviously it’s racist.

  • 1maybeso

    She did specify mainland China when she said she had been doing business IN China. She is not going to repeatedly refer to the Chinese as Mainland Chinese because no one does that. If you are Chinese-American, there is no reason to scream bloody murder because, as the author points out herself but seems to forget, there is a distinction between Chinese and American. If you are American, stop being offended for the Chinese when they are called out on their crap.

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.