Ryan Murdough, a white supremacist
An (older) new post I wrote over at Change.org last week:
Why Ryan Murdough is Racist and Why You Probably Are, Too
The wonderful thing about democracy is that even the most radical political extremists can participate in our political process. But of course, this is also democracy’s curse — particularly if these radical extremists are noxious white supremacists that try to spout racist, intolerant hatred from the largest soapbox they can manage.New Hampshire’s Ryan Murdough is one such case. A fringe Congressional candidate running as a Republican — a man unknown to the state’s political powers-that-be — Murdough flew under the radar until earlier this month, when he wrote a letter to the Concord Monitor. In it, Mudough outed himself as the state chairperson of the New Hampshire branch of the American Third Position Party.
Sound innocuous? Actually, the Southern Poverty Law Center (which tracks hate groups in America) labels this group ”a fledgling political party…with the aim of uniting disaffected racists.”
Murdough is a textbook white supremacist who sees multiculturalism as a threat — not just to his cultural identity, but to his very safety. In his letter to the editor, Murdough wrote, “Statistics show that areas with high non-white populations have higher rates of violent crime.” In a one-on-one interview with the Concord Monitor, Murdough expands on this viewpoint by suggesting that non-whites are genetically predispositioned to committing crime. “I’d rather live in a place that would be safer for my kids, and most of those places happen to be white. New Hampshire is an example.”
I don’t know anything about Murdough or the American Party, but I do know a couple of things about the SPLC.
First of all, there is no legal definition of “hate group.” Even the FBI doesn’t track “hate groups” for that reason.
The SPLC is a private fund-raising organization with nearly $190 million donor-dollars in cash on hand. The SPLC has no authority, legal, moral or otherwise, to designate any group as anything.
The FBI isn’t charged with tracking “hate groups,” but somehow the SPLC is? That doesn’t add up.
Also, NOT ONE of the SPLC’s top ten, highest paid officers is a minority, and certainly not an Asian. http://wp.me/pCLYZ-3r
The SPLC posts a “diverse” Board of Directors on their website, but a glance at their IRS Form 990, on the same web page, shows that with the exception of SPLC co-founder Joe Levin, all of the “Directors” are unpaid advisers with no impact on SPLC policies.
It’s nothing more than public relations brown-washing.
The Murdough clown wants to be surrounded by whites, apparently so do the three millionaire white guys who run the SPLC.
Richard Cohen is the President of the SPLC and Morris Dees is the founder. They are Jews, not White. Mark Potok is the Director of the Intelligence Outreach. He is also Jewish.
Ryan,
If you are the same Ryan Murdough, than your views are racist. You should just know that.
“Richard Cohen is the President of the SPLC and Morris Dees is the founder. They are Jews, not White. Mark Potok is the Director of the Intelligence Outreach. He is also Jewish.”
And, your point is…?
@Richard
Regardless of the backgrounds of those who run SPLC, the group provides ample evidence for their designations. They don’t just run around finger-pointing, but outline their line of thinking for designating groups hate groups. You are free to agree or disagree with their logic, but my experience has been that when a group is designated a hate group, it is done so carefully.
And the FBI cannot designate a group a hate group, because groups have the rights to aggregate under the First Amendment. The federal government isn’t in the business of deciding that a group’s ideology is or is not appropriate. The FBI is in the business of deciding if a group consitutes a physical threat to others.
A hate group as designated by the SPLC is based on whether or not their ideology is divisive and encourages violence from individual members.
In your opinion my views are racist.
Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for Everybody
Genocide by Assimilation
It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
@ Ryan
“In your opinion my views are racist.”
Correct. Thankfully, I operate under the dictionary definition of the term “racist”, whereas you appear to operate in a fantasy world where advocating racial segregation by world geography is somehow not racist.
“It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
Who is “they”?
Because: 1) no one advocates ending racism by promoting immigration into “white countries” — that’s absurd, 2) it’s ahistorical to refer to Canada and America as “white countries”, and 3) open doors policies that promote immigration are in place in most countries, including countries in Asia and Africa.
I mean, have you even BEEN to Asia? Are you even aware of the amount of multiculturalism in Asia?
Oh, and I love how you ascribe to the “First World” = White countries and “Third World” = non-White countries view. Forgetting that the Three Worlds model was developed by the so-called First World to distinguish themselves from the rest of the world, Japan is considered a First World country even in this flawed categorization scheme.
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
No, no they don’t. The final solution to racism is not interracial marriage. No one is trying to fuck themselves towards a more perfect union.
Actually, only racists think that interracial marriage is in any way related to addressing racism.
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
Than you would be deranged. As deranged as it would be to say that combatting racism can be achieved by dividing the world up into “white countries” and “black countries”.
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
Yeah, there’s one fatal flaw to your argument — no one is encouraging immigration and intermarriage with Whites in order to eradicate the White race.
Oh, wait, yes we are. In between puffs of cigar smoke in our backrooms, while we try on different black hats for size, we’re putting into motion a frightening scheme to invade and fuck Whites into non-existence. ‘Cuz, really it’s all one big conspiracy. A big conspiracy hinged on having lots of sex with White people.
But thank heavens you caught on. Too bad — all our evil scheming has been for naught. It was a brilliant plan, too…
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
By that logic, than racist = pro-white. Which means you would define yourself as racist.
And, on this one point, we agree. You are, in fact, racist.
An, look how this comment came full circle!
[...] Mantra on an Asian Feminist's blog Ryan J. Murdough says: August 16, 2010 at 10:21 am In your opinion my views are racist. Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries [...]
@ Jenn;
Sorry Jenn;
All you did was come full circle on yourself.
You are the racist.
You are talking like a member of a cult. Using razor words like nazi, bigot any other wordism is the oldest trick in book. Used by Kings, Popes and Preachers through out history to attack heretics who go against their regimes.
Leon Trotsky invented the racist word and intended for it to be used against only white people and only white people to destroy them and their culture.
As for the advocating the flooding of non-whites into United States, England and other white countries, and promoting multiculturalism and diversity to young white children? This falls under Article II of the 1948 International Treaty on Genocide.
You have made your position very clear. You are an advocate of the ethnic cleansing of young white children and support the genocide of the white race.
You have convinced me Jenn. Lets open the doors to the mega populations from Mexico, China, India, Africa and the Middle East. Lets give them special rights and privileges, lets allow them to vote and take over the place and change it, so we don’t recognize it anymore.
Of course the Asians have an excellent human rights record, don’t they Jenn? China is doing such a great job of turning Tibet into a multicultural paradise and didn’t the Japanese do such a wonderful job when they last toured China?
And what about those Africans who have already killed 10% of the White farmers in South Africa and are targeting Whites for murder at a rate 4 times higher, than any other race in South Africa. And that doesn’t include the beatings and rapes!
Of course I won’t mention what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians, except to say it legally qualifies as genocide. Look it up. I dare you.
And what about India and its troubles with Hindus and Muslims? Why are they always a fussin and a fightin?
If only the different races could all get along… If only race wasn’t real…
I’ll leave you with this last thought Jenn:
I don’t believe a word you say.
“Are you even aware of the amount of multiculturalism in Asia?”
Laugh out loud!
Lets check out some example of Asians attitude towards Diversity and Tolerance:
—–
The North Korean regime’s obsession with racial purity has led to the killing of disabled infants and forced abortions for women suspected of conceiving their babies by Chinese fathers, according to a growing body of testimony from defectors.
http://www.waragainsttheweakmovie.com/blog/2009/07/north-korea-and-eugenics/
—–
One of the sparks that ignited Xinjiang’s ethnic powder keg this week came from a toy factory here in southern China nearly 2,000 miles from Urumqi, the northwestern city hit by the riots.
The trouble started when rumors began to spread that Turkic-speaking, mainly Muslim Uighur migrant workers at the toy plant had raped Chinese women. Allegations also were posted online, and they traveled through the Han community.
Police would eventually say the charges were untrue. But as word spread of further alleged sexual assaults, enraged Han workers attacked their Uighur co-workers.
http://online.wsj.com/article/NA_WSJ_PUB:SB124699285048707143.html
——
Hey want to get off your High Horse now because the White Man is not buying what you are selling!
>I mean, have you even BEEN to Asia? Are you even aware of the amount of multiculturalism in Asia?
Name 1 Asian country where its founders are facing minority status before 2050 and its own leadership are doing it to their own people. America, Canada, Europe, Britain, Australia, New Zealand are all having this forced on them, and are told they are racist by people like you if they object. That’s because you are part of a system that is doing this to White people all over the world:
“Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for Everybody
Genocide by Assimilation
It is said that there is this RACE problem. They say this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
Oh and will this post slip through moderation? Or are you people going to censor me like the cowards you are?
Dear members of WhiteNewsNow and other White supremacist sites:
Welcome to this blog. I realize that you are hoping to inundate me with your rhetoric in order to harass me into changing my position, but racist invective will not be tolerated on this site. You should read my comment policy (http://www.reappropriate.com/about) before posting. Thoughtful, reasoned and non-inflammatory comments will be allowed, but this thread will be closely monitored.
I will endeavour to address your comments when I get a chance.
>Welcome to this blog.
Thank you Jenn.
In case you are unaware of what constitutes Genocide, I suggest you become fully informed, because there will be legal ramifications in the future, for those who have publicly supported it, or have passed policy encouraging it – no matter what their race or creed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genocide
In 1943, Lemkin wrote:
Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of the personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.[9]
Your comments thus far, indicate you support this:
“Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.”
“The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.”
“Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
“What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?”
“How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?”
“And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?”
“But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.”
“They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.”
“Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.”
[...] racialized, denouncements. In 2007, he made anti-immigrant remarks that sounded very much like the xenophobia and hate spouted by America’s White Nationalists: The war of words with NME continued in 2007 after Morrissey, who lived in Rome at the time, was [...]