Archive for July, 2012
Recently, I decided to participate in the Meatless Monday campaign for a number of reasons (including, but not limited, to GOP stupid). Having never done anything that could be even remotely construed as “vegetarian” before in my life, these posts will document my adventure into Monday Meatless-ness.
Lunch
 Today, I learned that people add meat to things that have no business having meat added to them. It's hard out here for the meatless.
Today is my first Monday of meatless-ness. Over the weekend, I was strangely giddy about embarking on this adventure; I found myself mentally planning the dinner for tonight. Unfortunately, I failed to make any considerations for lunch, and having failed to go grocery shopping over the weekend, I opened the fridge this morning (while I was running late) and realized that my only lunch options (meatless or otherwise) was a peanut butter and jelly sandwich. Bleagh. So, I decided to buy lunch.
My building contains a single food option (other than vending machines): a somewhat over-priced gourmet cafe on the first floor that sells a potpourri of decent meals, from fresh sandwiches and entrees to pre-packaged “sides”. Everything at this cafe is gigantic, and priced to reflect the gargantuan portion sizes; one can easily spend over $10 for a sandwich and drink (and have food enough for an afternoon snack).
Today, I went down to the lobby and was greeted with the sign proclaiming that their soup of the day was corn chowder (my favourite soup). I was thrilled — what a perfect way to kick-off Meatless Monday! — until I saw the fine print. Corn chowder… with shrimp and bacon.
What? WHAT? Shrimp and bacon?
 Bacon-wrapped shrimp is one of the nectar of the gods. It's also completely unnecessary in corn chowder.
I was immediately struck by a couple of thoughts: 1) boo, I can’t have corn chowder, and 2) how and why would someone feel the need to add meat to an already delicious soup style? The taste of those extra meaty bits would be virtually lost in the naturally strong flavour of corn chowder. Perhaps I had never fully appreciated it before, but the addition of meat to this soup seemed totally superfluous.
And that, right there, is the theme for today’s lunch.
Disappointed by the soup posting, I perused the pre-packaged food options (it takes forever for these folks to put a sandwich together, and I wasn’t about to brave the lunch rush) and saw a number of delicious options. All looked tasty! And– all of them contained meat. Tuna salad, potato salad with bits of bacon, Caeser salads containing bits of grilled chicken, wraps containing a variety of deli meats, tomato salads containing little flecks of ham or turkey or something. Even all of the full-course microwavable entrees were chock full of meats: penne carbonara, meatloaf, some sort of meatballs and gravy.
I had no idea it could be so difficult to find a vegetarian option! I also had no idea how pervasive meat was; meals that have no business having meat thrown into them were suddenly meat-ified. I couldn’t help but think of that corn chowder, disappointed that some enterprising cook thought “everything’s better with meat” while throwing in superfluous bits of shrimp and bacon, and in so doing limiting any real vegetarian options. I couldn’t help thinking of earlier this month, when one of my vegetarian friends joined us for some dim sum in Chinatown. “It’ll be fine!” we assured him, before discovering that everything (even the turnip cakes) contained little meat bits. In the end he was forced to eat lukewarm stalks of steamed Chinese broccoli while the rest of us apologetically gorged ourselves.
Today, I felt his pain.
I finally settled on a (delicious) tri-colour rotini pesto pasta salad (the total package comes to about 1 cup’s worth of salad) with chickpeas and bits of olives and tomatoes; it was either that or a big thing of potato salad, which looked like a dense carb bomb with a side of mayonnaise. I supplemented with a small bag of baked chips and a diet soda. At the register, I looked over my pasta salad thriceways — and even shook it a little — to ensure no little bits of meat were floating in the pesto. I ended up satisfied with my inaugural Meatless Monday meal, and also discovered a new-found appreciation for America’s strange addiction to meat. We seem to add it to everything, and for no apparent reason whatsoever.
No wonder obesity is an epidemic in this country.
Tune in to this post for my dinner update…
Tags: Meatless Mondays, Things I've eaten... Posted in Food-blogging, Health and Fitness | No Comments »
By JEL, guest contributor
 Your stance on Chick-Fil-A is Really Stupid. Why? Because you have one.
Since Chick-Fil-A CEO Dan Cathy sounded off on traditional marriage and biblical principles, everyone from conservative provocateurs to liberal politicians to my Facebook friends voiced their Johnny-come-lately support or opposition to waffle fries and iced tea. You can recap who said what when elsewhere. My point is that this entire faux flaptrap is really stupid.
Normally I reach for more eloquence, but it’s difficult to write poetry without inspiration, and I find nothing inspiring in another fake controversy designed only to increase page views and public profiles while further dividing Americans. It’s hard to ignore the obvious free speech implications – however ill-advised, Dan Cathy is a private citizen who expressed political views publically. It stretches credibility to taint his business with discrimination’s stench when no evidence of any kind has been unearthed to suggest that Chick-Fil-A franchises have ever discriminated against anyone based on sexual orientation or perceptions thereof. If one doesn’t wish to patronize a business based on the private political views of its chief executive, that’s fine. But we don’t call that a strike against intolerance. It’s just a personal choice.
And that’s what rankles – we aren’t supposed to exhibit independent thinking in America anymore. Independent thought – the ability to decide issues for yourself – allowed me to oppose many elements of the gay rights movement for years. I didn’t understand why rainbow flags and safe spaces and same sex public displays of affection were important, or why they should be to me. I never heard of the concept of gay marriage before college. I once thoroughly embarrassed a friend of mine by visiting his sociology class as I toured Penn State at seventeen. The professor invited some spokespeople from a local gay rights group to discuss their experiences before the class. One woman discussed feeling trapped in her body – she desired men, but felt she should have been born a man.
For whatever reason, this concept floored me. I didn’t possess the good sense to shut up. My hand shot skyward. My voice intoned disbelief. “Doesn’t what you’ve described make you straight? Wouldn’t it simply be easier to remain female? What could you possibly hope to gain by surgery? You’ve just listened to two gay men describe their persecution: why choose that?” The class reeled. The teacher blanched. My friend seethed. I was young, but not innocent.
Now I’m neither. I recognize that I turned that classroom into a public hearing on the nature and morality of gender manipulation, an experience which no trans person should ever be subject. It was hurtful. I pressed the interrogation without regard for the practiced indifference to personal narrative adults call tolerance. I was honest – I didn’t understand her point of view, and I wanted her to explain it further. Years later, I can’t say I’ve personally experienced anything like what that woman described, but I do understand that other people can. That matters. Being exposed to mind-bendingly different points of view matters. If anything, the widespread support gay marriage enjoys among members of my generation stems directly from the personal familiarity many of us have with gay people. We know, much more than our parents can know, that gay people are just and fallible and beautiful as the rest of us. They are us, and nothing is gained by denying human liberty to any of us based on identity alone.
The point is that we (some of us, anyway) have to have the space and the time and the desire to learn that. Independent thought is still the only real American freedom. Not to paraphrase Aaron Sorkin in The American President, but it’s true – this is advanced citizenship. You have to be willing to choose what you believe for yourself, and change your mind when presented with new data. I believe earning one’s keep here means engaging the debates about our economic future and our unemployed present, about our eagerness to incarcerate and our unwillingness to educate, about our desire to assimilate immigrants and our fear of losing ourselves.
And foolish culture war hysteria like this Chick-Fil-A thing is killing the debate! We can’t discuss culture anymore without safe spaces and political correctness. Warring camps aim potshots across the rhetorical demilitarized zone that used to represent public consensus on domestic and foreign policy – even when that consensus denied opportunity and full citizenship to many minority groups. Even when we were wrong, we were wrong together! Or so I’ve read. This is another one of those American lives I’ve never personally experienced.
I was born after Atwater; weaned during the era of welfare queens and Star Wars. Corporate clientelism and microtargeting campaigns dissected the American electorate before I learned to walk. By elementary school it didn’t matter if you kept Hope alive; Willie Horton kept your playmate’s parents afraid of you. The point is that we have always suffered Americans who benefit from the perpetual campaign, who profit from cultural demarcation and segregated society. Given this, we have the benefit of hindsight. Yet too many liberals today emulate the dividers! I used to have the same three debates every time I hung out with friends in Drinking Liberally Tucson – why do conservatives run the media, why do conservatives hate science, and why aren’t conservatives as tolerant and multicultural as me?
My answers? They don’t. They don’t profit. You’re not.
But the questions are the trouble. Using labels to discuss people ensures that your audience will only recognize the humanity in those people if they view themselves in the subject group. This was why in my experience at Drinking Liberally Tucson, no one was ever chastised for using the word ‘conservative’ as a pejorative, but people were regularly offended when I spoke about White people. Look, this isn’t anti-label advocacy, this is a appeal to common sense. Liberals, unless you have personally purchased a chicken sandwich and lemonade from Chick-Fil-A only to find Leviticus 18 and 20 printed like some Jerry Falwell fortune cookie inside the oily foil wrapper, shut up about boycotting Chick-Fil-A.
I didn’t say go purchase food from them, I said shut up about it. The company isn’t intolerant, Dan Cathy is. And he’s within his rights to be as intolerant as he likes. You don’t have to support his company, or all the service industry workers who process chicken parts into fried breaded goodness with pickles. But you can’t pretend you are fighting corporate intolerance when the corporation isn’t intolerant! It’s just silly. Divisive. Stupid.
Nor has biting into a chicken sandwich become a partisan fuck you to the gay rights community. It’s just a damn sandwich. When a politician who once championed weight loss (including his own) as a public health issue encourages increased fried fast food consumption in a dangerously obese nation to support those to oppose gay marriage, his public comments lack import, and respectable voters no longer need heed his words. Stop taking pictures of yourself buying and eating Chick-Fil-A sandwiches, people! Gay people don’t care about your lunch. Your Facebook friends don’t care about your lunch. No one cares about your lunch! You can’t order solidarity with Christian tradition by number in a drive thru.
Especially since the company is guilty of nothing. Dan Cathy transformed ‘Eat Mor Chikin’ into yet another cultural Rorschach on which we project our biases, and we can’t have a reasoned debate about gay marriage or any other cultural touchstone amid all the projecting. America is neither Christian theocracy nor cosmopolitan Europe. America is the debate. We have the right to disagree with the choices’ other people make, but our Union is best preserved when we attempt to understand those social and political choices. I’m older now. I’ve known different people. I’ve read Randy Shilts. More than just a positive life choice, marriage in my view is a human right that should exist for all people. If you disagree, that’s fine. Let’s talk about it. After you are done with your lunch.
Tags: Chick-Fil-A, Culture Wars, Dan Cathy, Mike Huckabee Posted in Health and Fitness, LGBTQ, Politics | 1 Comment »
 George Takei will be performing alongside a star-studded cast of Asian American Broadway and TV actors in the upcoming musical, "Allegiance", which tells about life in an internment camp.
A Japanese American woman, now a grandmother, was interned at Tule Lake during WWII. Recently, on Reddit, she was featured on their “I Am A…” schedule. For hours, she answered user-submitted questions, which were translated and typed up by the woman’s daughter and granddaughter.
Through the course of the interview, the granddaughter learned that her grandmother was a “no-no boy”, having answered ‘no’ to two loyalty questions distributed to internees a year prior to the end of internment. Those questions were:
- “Are you willing to serve in the armed forces of the United States on combat duty wherever ordered?”
- “Will you swear unqualified allegiance to the United States of America and faithfully defend the United States from any or all attack by foreign or domestic forces, and forswear any form of allegiance or obedience to the Japanese emperor, to any other foreign government, power or organization?”
Having been born a United States citizen, the IAmA internee featured on Reddit spent a great deal of time agonizing over her answers before choosing to answer “no”. In so doing, she renounced her American citizenship and became statesless; after internment, she eventually regained her citizenship. She writes (with her granddaughter adding comments in the brackets):
We renounced our citizenship about a year before we left [the internment camps] to stay with our parents. One of the questions was “Did we have any loyalty to the Japanese Emperor?”. Many people didn’t like that question. We were born in America. Why would we have any loyalty to the Japanese Emperor?
(She’s referring to the loyalty questions. She didn’t talk about it this time, but she usually tells me that after the questionare came out, they had meetings every night to try to figure out what to answer. At the time there were rumors going around that everyone would be shipped back to Japan. If they said they weren’t loyal, they would be alienated in Japan (as well as the United States). If they answered yes, she would probably be able to stick with her parents.)
I also learned through this post about the internment camp stockades, basically a jail built to hold unruly interns. It’s described here:
She didn’t know much about them at all. I personally had never heard of it until I went to the pilgrimage. I was like 14 at the time so I don’t remember much, but here’s what I do remember. I remember that it was built to only hold somewhere around 30 people and something like 100 people ended up there. It was built using really nice concrete, so it’s the only building that remains standing. Someone was really nice and donated a cover that was built over it so it would be preserved. We got to go inside and it was really dark and creepy and there were poems on the wall (and graffiti from taggers). It’s not surprising though. If people would go through and dig up a cemetery, graffiti on a wall is nothing.
The full feature is quite fascinating. This link contains the cleaned up version of both questions and answers (minus Reddit user comments).
While we’re on the topic, check out the website for Allegiance, an upcoming musical starring George Takei and the incredible, incredible Lea Salonga, which follows a story set in Japanese American internment camps. The show opens at the Old Globe in San Diego Sept 7-19.
Tags: Allegiance, George Takei, Japanese American Internment, Tule Lake Posted in APA History, Asian Americans | No Comments »
 Oh meat -- you are both so delicious and so terrible for us.
A few days ago, the USDA (the U.S. Department of Agriculture), responsible for executing the federal government’s policies on food and agriculture regulation, released an internal memo describing various measures wherein the USDA is trying to lead by example in representing the U.S.’ commitment to agricultural, environmental, and health-related priorities. The topic of this week’s memo was how the USDA can improve the environmental impact of its headquarters. One article encouraged employees at USDA headquarters to commit to a movement called “Meatless Mondays”; to choose not to consume meat one day a week.
Writes the USDA:
One simple way to reduce your environmental impact while dining at our cafeterias is to participate in the “Meatless Monday” initiative. This international effort, as the name implies, encourages people not to eat meat on Mondays. Meatless Monday is an initiative of The Monday Campaign Inc. in association with the John Hopkins School of Public Health.
How will going meatless one day of the week help the environment? The production of meat, especially beef (and dairy as well), has a large environmental impact. According to the U.N., animal agriculture is a major source of greenhouse gases and climate change. It also wastes resources. It takes 7,000 kg of grain to make 1,000 kg of beef. In addition, beef production requires a lot of water, fertilizer, fossil fuels, and pesticides. In addition there are many health concerns related to the excessive consumption of meat. While a vegetarian diet could have a beneficial impact on a person’s health and the environment, many people are not ready to make that commitment. Because Meatless Monday involves only one day a week, it is a small change that could produce big results.
Did you notice that our cafeterias have tasty meatless options? So you can really help yourself and the environment while having a good vegetarian meal!
Wikipedia has a nice article about the environmental impact of meat. In brief, cattle require on average about 7lbs of feed for every pound of meat produced, whereas pork requires about 3lbs of feed and chicken requires about 2lbs of feed. In addition, there is substantial amounts of water consumed in the raising of cattle, as well as the production of waste. Although cow manure is commonly recycled as fertilizer, methane gases produced by cattle contributes to ~14-18% of greenhouse gas emissions globally.
 And by "methane gases", I mean "cow farts".
Red meat consumption (particularly overconsumption) is also associated with increased cardiovascular disease, hypertension, diabetes and cancer. Although red meat isn’t generically bad for you, the Meatless Monday initiative notes that Americans typically eat about 45% more red meat than is recommended (by the USDA!) to maintain a healthy diet.
Okay, so the USDA raises awareness about the Meatless Monday initiative in its newsletter. It encourages employees to think about their red meat consumption, and draws attention to its meatless alternatives in its cafeterias. In short, the USDA hasn’t instituted a Meatless Monday policy at its headquarters; it’s merely drawing attention to the negative environmental and health impacts of red meat to its employees. This is, incidentally, entirely consistent with the USDA’s mission.
This is the kind of thing that should totally have flown under the radar.
But, leave it to the Republicans to get all riled up. From the National Cattleman’s Beef Association to various Republican senators of beef-producing states, the Republicans are up in arms over the USDA’s three-paragraph discussion of vegetarianism. Reports ABC:
The association’s president, J.D. Alexander, said the newsletter called into question the USDA’s “commitment” to farmers and ranchers. He called the newsletter “awakening,” and condemned the agency for failing to understand efforts made to produce food sustainably. He cited progress the industry has made over the last 30 years to produce more meat with fewer environmental costs.
“This move by USDA should be condemned by anyone who believes agriculture is fundamental to sustaining life on this planet,” Alexander said.
Sen. Jerry Moran (R-Kansas) noticed, too. Once he saw Twitter responses to the USDA’s promotion of Meatless Mondays, he immediately printed out the USDA’s newsletter and headed down to the Senate floor, his aide, Garrette Silverman told ABCNews.com. Kansas is the third-largest beef producer in the country.
“We are a beef-producing state and it is one of the items that improves our balance of trade as we export meat and beef around the world,” Moran concluded his three-minute speech on the Senate floor. “And, yet, our own Department of Agriculture encourages people not to consume meat.”
A press release from Moran’s office called the newsletter “demonizing” to the meat industry and meat consumers. He said the letter “attacks” meat production and fails to acknowledge livestock’s role in the economy.
“Never in my life would I have expected USDA to be opposed to farmers and ranchers,” Sen. Moran said.
Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa tweeted his own indignation over the Meatless Monday campaign. He vowed that he would personally eat enough meat on Mondays to compensate for the USDA’s recommendations about Meatless Monday.
 He's gonna have to eat a LOT of meat to make up for all the vegetarians in the world.
Look, the science is irrefutable — the meat industry is environmentally taxing. But, what’s really galling is the GOP’s brazen refusal to allow science and facts to at least temper their response as they rise to the defense of the meat packing industry. What’s galling is the GOP’s conflation of meat consumption with base American patriotism: as if eating a T-bone steak will bring troops back from Iraq (while choosing soy milk in your coffee puts you in league with the terrorists). Rather than to acknowledge the simple truth that cows and pigs and chicken and farm-raised fish are environmentally costly, and to introduce legislation that might both address this problem in a manner that could favour farmers and correct this environmental problem, Republicans instead fall-in-line behind a completely brainless, knee-jerk campaign of obvious pandering. They are rushing to the defense of an industry that makes about $52 billion dollars annually and yet still receives subsidies from the federal government.
This reaction — this reaction, right here — is what’s wrong with America and American politics today. It’s simply impossible to try and reach across the aisle and build bipartisan legislation with a party that can’t even tolerate a hint at criticizing an industry that provides millions of dollars to pad the coffers of the Republican party; and, particularly when those criticisms are backed by science. This is why the GOP is out of touch with what Americans both want and need. This is why the GOP are political bullies. This is why the GOP hates science. This is why the GOP will run this country into the ground if given half a chance.
Well, in response to the Republican histrionics and hand-wringing, James and I have come to a decision: we’re going to go meatless (on Mondays).
 This will be a challenge, since I do have a bit of this mindset.
James and I already follow basic USDA guidelines for red meat consumption. It’s already not a huge component of our diet. We typically purchase lean beef when we buy it, and we prefer chicken or seafood. But, nonetheless, we’re going to try and cut out all meat on Mondays.
We confess, this could be tough. We’ve never tried to do anything that could be construed as “vegetarian”. Our decision to do this is fueled in small part by our recognition that the meat industry is indeed wasteful and is harming the environment. We also recognize the health benefits of reducing our red meat consumption: it will further help combat cardiovascular disease and cancer. Finally, this probably has a little something to do with the fact that we’re growing an organic vegetable garden on our patio that has resulted in a near-endless supply of salad.
But mostly, this is a reaction to the GOP reaction to the USDA, and the USDA’s subsequent retraction of its memo. This a “fuck you” to Republican stupid.
 And boy, there's probably more Republican stupid than there are cow farts in the upper atmosphere.
We don’t pretend that our decision will, alone, significantly impact meat production in this country. We know that two people vowing to not eat meat one day a week isn’t going to bankrupt any of Senator Grassley’s Iowan farm-working voters. And we’re not doing this because we think cows and pigs and chickens and fish are cute and cuddly and shouldn’t be eaten. We are not members of PETA; Tuesday through Sunday, cows and pigs and chicken and fish are still food.
But, hopefully two people vowing to not eat meat one day a week will encourage a few other people to look at what small changes they can make in their day-to-day lives to, well, live better lives. Because, in the end, the principle behind Meatless Mondays is a sound one: global change comes from a critical mass of everyday people making incremental — but permanent — lifestyle changes to better the world around us. And, I like that philosophy.
And finally, this is a challenge directly issued to the desk of Senator Grassley: put your money where your mouth is. If you really plan on eating more meat on Mondays to compensate for Meatless Mondays, than you can start with the meat that James and I won’t be eating.
So here’s the rules:
Every Monday, James and I will be going meatless. That means no beef, no pork, no chicken, no turkey and no fish (or other seafood-related meat products). We will be constructing entirely vegetarian dishes for our meals. We are permitting the use of animal products (milk, eggs, and cheese). And, at the risk of becoming a food blogger, I will post about our Meatless Monday adventures on this blog (at least as long as I can stand posting pictures of food).
If the USDA recommends that each adult eat 2-3 servings of meat a day, than James and I are collectively foregoing just over a pound of red meat every Monday. And that’s a pound more of meat that Senator Grassley’s going to have to eat to make up for us.
 ... or four McDonalds' quarter-pounders.
Anyone else with me? I’m curious to know exactly how much meat Chuck Grassley’s going to have to eat on Mondays from now on.
Act Now! More information on the Meatless Mondays campaign can be found here. And stay tuned for more on our Meatless Monday adventures.
Tags: Meatless Mondays, Republican Stupid, Vegetarianism Posted in All About Jenn, Health and Fitness, Science | 3 Comments »
 Gu Kailai is pictured on the left, and with her husband, Bo Xilai, on the right.
News outlets are reporting that Gu Kailai, wife of popular and ousted Chinese politician Bo Xilai, has been charged with murder in the death of British businessman, Neil Heywood. Chinese officials argue that Gu and a family aide, Zhang Xiaojun, poisoned Heywood; the murder was allegedly prompted by “economic interests” disputed between Gu and Heywood.
It remains unclear (at least in my mind) whether these charges are authentic, or politically motivated. Or both. CNN has the full scoop.
Tags: Bo Xilai, China, Gu Kailai, Neil Heywood Posted in Asians Behaving Badly | No Comments »
|
|