900+ Asian American Studies Scholars Issue Collective Statement Decrying Trump’s Proposed Muslim Registry

December 4, 2016

collective-statement-aas-muslim-registry

Over 900 Asian American Studies scholars from across the United States issued a joint statement today decrying President-Elect Donald Trump’s proposal to create a national registry of Muslims and Muslim Americans.

Trump has repeatedly said that as president he would institute aggressive measures to limit immigration of Muslims into the country and to place Muslims currently within the United States’ borders under close scrutiny. He has promised to halt the entry of Syrian refugees and to also ban immigration from a number of countries — including Pakistan and the Philippines — with large Muslim populations. He is quoted as suggesting the creation of a national database of Muslim and Muslim Americans — a proposal that is likely unconstitutional — and he staffed his White House transition team with Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, the architect of the highly controversial NSEERS registry system which was used to monitor the movement of Muslim immigrants under George W. Bush and the first half of the Obama administration.

Earlier this month, Trump surrogate Carl Higbie went on Fox News to defend Trump’s alarming proposals to register Muslims and Muslims Americans. In an appearance on The Kelly File, Higbie suggested that Trump’s proposal for a national Muslim registry has legal precedent: Japanese American incarceration during World War II (for a note on language, see JACL’s Power of Words handbook).

It should come as no surprise that Asian American Studies scholars have something to say about that dubious line of reasoning.

In their collective statement — published over the weekend on Medium — 938 Asian American Studies scholars and interdisciplinary allies criticized the Trump team’s use of Japanese American incarceration history to support the targeting of Muslims and Muslim Americans. They write:

As scholars of Asian American studies, we feel we are uniquely positioned to respond to recent statements made by the president-elect and his spokespeople using the history of what is known as Japanese American internment to justify a proposed registry for immigrants entering the United States from Muslim-majority nations.

…Such statements willfully disregard decades of knowledge about so-called “internment,” ranging from the vast body of historical scholarship and educational materials produced on the subject to the achievements of the redress movement as consecrated in the 1988 Civil Liberties Act, passed by a bipartisan Congress and signed by President Ronald Reagan. This legislation, which formally apologized to imprisoned Japanese Americans, unequivocally states: “The internment of the individuals of Japanese ancestry was caused by racial prejudice, war hysteria, and a failure of political leadership.” The legislation implicitly acknowledges that the government, through its policy of mass imprisonment, facilitated and sanctioned anti-Asian discrimination and violence throughout the country. Alarmingly, calls for a Muslim registry now both draw upon and indirectly condone the rise of Islamophobia, xenophobia, and racism in recent months.

That the president-elect promises to “make America great” by institutionalizing thinly veiled racist policies and practices assaults our principles and values. Alongside Black Lives Matter, DREAMers, #NoDAPL, and other social justice movements, we cannot stand for policies or rhetoric that threaten any of our communities. We understand the legacy of so-called internment as a guiding light of what not to do for our present and future. We fear the long term implications of any list based on race or religion. The proposed policy of a Muslim registry lays a dangerous ground for the violation of civil liberties that may or may not include mass imprisonment. We reject using Japanese American mass imprisonment to justify the targeting of Muslim people.

Statement co-organizer, Vivian Shaw (@vgshaw) — a doctoral candidate in Sociology at the University of Texas at Austin whose work focuses on race, hate speech and social movements in Japan — believes that Trump’s election is a clarion call for ethnic studies scholars and intellectuals to further engage in the public discourse.

“As scholars, I think our role in politics resides not only in working directly with policy-makers but in creating and sharing knowledge,” says Shaw. “In this vein, it’s of crucial importance for scholars to continually strive to “bridge the gap” and put critical concepts into common language. Asian American Studies scholars, in my opinion, are well-disposed to take up this task because social justice, solidarity, and an awareness of the transnational ramifications of “domestic” politics have always been central to our intellectual history.”

Shaw points out that Trump’s attacks on the Muslim American community also represent an assault on the Asian American community. Not only is the Asian American community diverse and inclusive of many Muslim, Black, Latinx, and indigenous members,  but as Asian American Studies scholars and activists, our work is also necessarily intersectional and coalitional.

“Asian American studies is constantly in exchange with gender studies, black studies, Latinx and Latin American studies, indigenous studies,” says Shaw. “Historically, we have seen coalition-building at various points throughout the twentieth century and more recently, efforts such as AAPI’s solidarity with #BlackLivesMatter.”

When it comes to the Trump team’s ahistorical misreading of Japanese American incarceration, it is particularly incumbent upon the Asian American community to speak up and to set the record straight.

“The decades of research on Japanese American exclusion and incarceration not only teach us about the depth of suffering that was “justified” under Executive Order 9066,” says Shaw. “[It also teaches us] how xenophobia and racism can create a direct pathway for governments to change the rules of our civil liberties.”

“We cannot be silent in the face of injustice,” says Shaw.

Here is the link to the full statement: Collective Statement by Asian American Studies Scholars regarding Japanese American “Internment” and a Proposed Registry of Immigrants from Muslim-majority Countries

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.