National Exit Polls Totally Underestimated Clinton’s Support among AAPI Voters

November 10, 2016


Following the devastating defeat of Democratic nominee Hillary Rodham Clinton by Republican nominee — and now President-elect — Donald Trump, national media outlets are now racing to figure out where it all went wrong. Some pundits have used national exit polling data to place the blame on voters of colour, noting that Black, Latino, and Asian voters supported Clinton at slightly lower margins than they voted to re-elected Barack Obama in 2012. Trump’s victory, they argue, is the fault of non-White voters whom they essentially blame for not acquiescing to their own electoral capture.

There are a couple of obvious issues with that damning narrative. One is, of course, that national exit polling data are wrong about Clinton’s support among AAPI voters.

Results of national exit polling data from CNN. (Photo credit: CNN)

National exit polls report that Asian voters supported Clinton by 65% to 29%, which is a lopsidedly left margin that indicates that Clinton managed to retain the Asian American, as well as Black and Latino electorate.

I’ve already discussed concerns about electoral capture raised by such voting trends. However, there’s another problem: this exit polling appears to woefully underestimate AAPI support for Clinton on Tuesday; probably because this national exit poll surveyed less than 1000 AAPI across the country, and conducted their poll only in English.

Two separate polls that corrected these problems and conducted on or near Election Day reveal that AAPIs supported Clinton by an even more lopsided margin than that reported in mainstream media.

In a phone-based survey within the week leading up to November 8th, 2016 by UC Berkeley researcher Taeku Lee, 75% of AAPI respondents reported that they would be voting for Clinton. Corroborating that finding, exit polling conducted by the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF) of over 14,400 AAPI voters who cast ballots in 14 states also reported that 79% of AAPI voters supported Clinton.  Both polls are more precise than national exit polling data because they over-sample AAPI voters, and surveys were conducted in multiple non-English languages.

Data Source: AALDEF 2016 exit poll

These numbers indicate that AAPI voters actually voted for Hillary Clinton at roughly the same margins as they backed Barack Obama in 2012; in that election, 77% of AAPI voters supported Obama. This support was consistent across most states, including traditionally red states. Furthermore, early reports from APIAVote suggest that AAPI voter turnout may have reached an historic high in the 2016 election: data from states such as Nevada, Florida and North Carolina indicate that AAPI turnout among early voters was nearly double its rate in previous years. Notably, Clinton’s support was highest among AAPIs living in Michigan and Pennsylvania, two states that ultimately decided the election’s outcome by flipping for Trump.

Commentators who suggest that Clinton failed to retain AAPI voters are just plain wrong. Clinton performed exceedingly well among AAPI voters, who chose on Tuesday to join Black and Latino voters to preserve the Obama coalition. Instead, it was the White median voter in rural middle America who abandoned left-wing America and who elected into the White House a blustering bigot whose plan for his first 100 days in office will materially devastate public policy that benefits America’s most most vulnerable populations.

We — Black, Latino, and Asian & Pacific Islander America — didn’t do this. These next four years is entirely on the 58% of White voters who voted for Trump.

Please stay tuned for more Election 2016 coverage in the coming days. If you would like to submit your own writing for publication on Reappropriate, please do so here.

Did you like this content? Please consider becoming a patron of Reappropriate and get exclusive access to the brand new Reappropriate vlog!

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.


Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.