I’m Not Here for the Asian Americans Who Won’t Get Behind #BlackLivesMatter

July 8, 2016
Philando Castile, in an undated photo from social media.
Philando Castile, in an undated photo from social media.

Two days ago, police shot and killed another Black man — the latest victim in an epidemic of state-sanctioned gun violence against Black bodies that has already claimed 136 Black lives in 2016. Philando Castile, 32, was driving in a car with his girlfriend Diamond Reynolds and her 4-year-old daughter when their car was pulled over by police in Falcon Heights, Minnesota for a broken tail light. Castile, who was licensed to conceal-and-carry, notified the officer that he was armed and that he was reaching for his wallet to retrieve his ID and registration, as per the cop’s instructions. He did everything that young Black boys are taught to do in the Talk. The officer fired four shots anyways, killing Castile before his horrified family — all over a burned out light bulb.

National attention is focused today on Minnesota as we mourn Castile’s death. Unlike the vast majority of Black and Brown men shot and killed by police every day — whose deaths receive scant attention or outrage — we cannot help but be confronted by the pain of Castile’s murder. Just minutes after the still unnamed police officer shot and killed Castile, Reynolds began streaming the killing’s aftermath live on Facebook. An understandably distraught Reynolds broadcast the full trauma of a racialized police encounter turned deadly, using her video to pray, ask for help, and to record important details about the incident.

One important detail is Reynolds’ description of the police officer who killed Castile. Recounted from the backseat of a police cruiser while she was still handcuffed, Reynolds narrated in her video that the police officer who killed Philando Castile was a “heavyset” “Chinese” man. That officer was later identified as Jeronimo Yanez, whose race and ethnicity has not been revealed.

Frankly, I don’t think it matters if Castile’s killer was non-White, or if he is indeed Asian American. Black lives matter. Black lives matter when a White police officer shoots and kills Alton Sterling on Tuesday for selling CDs in a parking lot, and Black lives matter when a non-White police officer shoots and kills Philando Castile on Wednesday. Black lives matter regardless of the race of the person who takes them. Hours after Castile’s death, Minnesota governor Mark Dayton confirmed that race played a role in the shooting, saying that Castile likely would not be dead were he White.

The deaths of Philando Castile and of Alton Sterling — killed less than 24 hours earlier by police for selling CDs in a parking lot — demonstrates the value that society still fails to place on Black lives. Asian Americans cannot afford to be bystanders in this fight, because this is our fight, too. All of America stands at a crossroads, staring down a quintessential moral choice: what kind of society do we want to live in? Do we choose a society where the lives of Black and Brown people — including Black and Brown Asian Americans — has value? Or, do we continue to uphold a system that places no value in the lives of non-White people, including our own; and wherein only some can place their trust in our law enforcement?

What side will we choose?

Alton Sterling, in an undated photo posted to social media.
Alton Sterling, in an undated photo posted to social media.

Yesterday, as I was trying to synthesize my thoughts for this post, I re-read Mari Matsuda’s excellent essay “We Will Not Be Used.” In it, Matsuda suggests that Asian Americans are in danger of becoming America’s racial bourgeoisie — its Whiteness wannabes, pigeonholed by racism and classism into the racial middle class where we exist only to wedge apart those who “have” and those who “have not”.

By recognizing our status, we must also recognize that status as a choice. Writes Matsuda:

If white, as it has been historically, is the top of the racial hierarchy in America, and black, historically, is the bottom, will yellow assume the place of the racial middle? The role of the racial middle is a critical one. It can reinforce white supremacy if the middle deludes itself into thinking it can be just like white if it tries hard enough. Conversely, the middle can dismantle white supremacy if it refuses to be the middle, if it refuses to buy into racial hierarchy, and if it refuses to abandon communities of black and brown people, choosing instead to forge alliances with them.

Twenty years after Matsuda delivered the fundraising speech that would become this landmark essay, the racial landscape has not changed for Asian Americans. As a community, we still have not committed to a choice. Many are still caught up in the misguided belief that Asian Americans can find social justice by working to sand down the edges of racism in a White supremacist state. Meanwhile, those of us who refuse to play the role of the racial bourgeois are labeled “the enemy”.

The Asian American community needs to have a frank conversation about the anti-blackness in our midst. And, indeed, we have a problem: our community is rank with the stench of internalized disdain for Black lives. Some Asian Americans openly believe that the fight for Black lives is antithetical to the fight for Asian American rights. They blame Black male victims of police violence for their own murder. They make the killing of an unarmed Black man all about sympathy for the Chinese American police officer who pulled the trigger. In so doing, they reinforce their belief that Black lives don’t matter to them; or, at least, don’t matter as much to them as Chinese American lives. These Asian Americans have made their choice. They have chosen the racial middle, on the misguided assumption that time spent there will make space in the racial upper-class one day accessible, and generally worth having.

I, like many others, have chosen differently.

We believe that a racial upper class built upon the backs of the oppressed is both immoral and worthless. We believe that the fight for racial justice — for Asian Americans and for all people of colour — demands that we fight also for the preservation of Black lives against state-sanctioned violence. We believe that a system that does not value Black lives cannot ever truly value Asian lives either. We reject America’s racial hierarchy, even if our current system occasionally offers some among us limited — and easily revoked — advantages. We refuse to abandon our Black and Brown allies and brethren to socioeconomic and physical destruction just to preserve our own marginal skin privilege.

Police violence against Asian American and Pacific Islander bodies occurs, particularly in Minnesota where police took Philando Castile’s life earlier this week. But, it does not occur equally for all Asian Americans, and it does not occur to the same extent as it does for non-Asian American Black folk. Southeast Asian Americans, Pacific Islanders, and Arab Americans were two to three times more likely to die at the hands of police in 2015 than East Asian Americans, according to my back-of-the-envelope calculations using the The Counted database; all of these numbers are still dwarfed by the rate at which Black people are routinely killed by police. As we talk about police violence, we must acknowledge all of these facts.

Our system is built upon a foundation of anti-Black racism. The racial hierarchy that enabled Chinese Exclusion, Japanese American incarceration, and the profiling of East Asian American scientists did so because it is built upon the broader logic of non-White dehumanization. We cannot cherry-pick from such a system the selective humanization of only certain people of colour while we preserve its crimes against other people of colour. Yet, rather than to work together to dismantle that system, we are taught to embrace the work of adding cement between the bricks of that racist foundation. Some among us would do that work gladly. We reinforce our own oppression by justifying the oppression of others. We are rendered blind to the connections between racism (against Asians) and racism (against non-Asians). We are allowed to forget that silence in the face of murder is complicity.

Asian Americans are part of this fight, whether we are explicitly mentioned — as with Peter Liang or due to early rumours that Philando Castile’s killer was Chinese — or not. Black lives must matter to us every day of every week. To those who rallied to free Peter Liang on the grounds that you were moved to fight for “two victims” in “one tragedy”: Where were you when Freddie Grey’s killers went free? Where are you now in the fight for justice for Alton Sterling and Philando Castile and all the other Black men and women whose name have become hashtags? If you are the sort of person who only shows up to defend Asian American lives in the Black Lives Matter fight, then Black lives do not matter to you.

Twenty years ago, Mari Matsuda sang a song of hope that Asian Americans will not be used to reinforce a racial hierarchy that oppresses Black and Brown people. This week, I ask that you join this chorus, and that we collectively raise our voices even louder in song. We will not be used to rationalize this nation’s war against Black lives.

I am unashamed to be an #API4BlackLives, and I choose to fight to ensure that #BlackLivesMatter.

I’m not here for any Asian American who chooses differently.

On July 11, AAPI civil rights organizations are hosting a call for solidarity with Black Lives Matter. RSVP for the call here.

  • I’m inclined to agree, Skeet. Ryder has received the benefit of multiple attempts to engage critically from both of us, and in the slew of comments posted today, literally none have actually met either tour or my offerings of counter arguments and additional statistics with anything but oddly worded attempts to insult you and I. Trolling? I’m not sure, but certainly not definitely quickly no longer holding my interest.

    I’m going to leave this to the site’s other mod to see what to do. Meanwhile I see no point in engaging someone whose idea of a reasoned counter argument is: “are you stupid?”

  • This is possibly the funniest comment I’ve read this week. First criticizing BLM as cop killers, and then taking credit for BLM’s policy wing. Lol!

    BTW, Campaign Zero is new branding but the core ideas are identical to what first sparked the BLM movement in 2013. For proof all you need do is read the hashtag’s history. Campaign Zero is a central repository for things that have been said in the hashtag for years.

    Either way, I’m still looking for you to point out where in this site organizers are advocating shooting cops. Is it before the emphasis on more on-the-job training or after the call for body cams?

  • Ryder

    Donald Trump, who is on record for saying words… is more aggressive than BLM. Because security guards.

    Really.

    Well, it’s interesting that he, personally, is now a movement.

    Nice fantasy land you’ve got going there 🙂

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3321190/F-filthy-white-s-Black-Lives-Matter-protesters-scream-epithets-white-students-studying-Dartmouth-library.html

    etc.

    etc.

    etc.

    it’s endless… and only a small amount is actually caught on camera.

    Get real, mate.

  • Skeet Duran

    Right Jenn, if he knows anything about debating, there’s a reason why they have the “quote” function in every forum, so that debaters can address each point. Unless he thinks everything is intertwined into one big block.

  • Ryder

    Looking for me to find something in a place I never said to look… in a place SPECIFICALLY ERECTED to mask what’s been going on… is of course a pathetic waste of my time.

    Here is the REASON WHY that site was created… because the actual demands… are the most telling:

    http://www.bizpacreview.com/2016/07/13/black-lives-matter-has-list-of-demands-including-one-big-one-as-they-block-minneapolis-freeway-364575

    Again, you’re welcome.

  • Lol! That article is 1) crappy regurgi-journalism of a press release, and 2) literally has nothing to do with the creation of Campaign Zero, which was formulated nearly one year ago on August 21, 2015. The website is new; not the ideas.

    And 3) — and I hope you can follow me on this one — calling for the disbanding of police (whether you agree with that demand or not) is not even a little bit like calling for the shooting of police… Because disbanding a group and shooting all its members isn’t the same thing.

    I mean this with all sincerity: Ryder, you need to turn your channel away from Fox and conservative radio. Your apparent ignorance of the basic history of the last two or three years with regard to BLM is embarrassing, and totally undermines any point you might be trying to make about the movement’s credibility.

  • Uhhhhmmmm… Do you realize that last video is of people literally running over BLM protesters with their cars? And you’re citing it as evidence of BLM’s supposed aggression.

    Are you even trying at this point?

  • KamikaziPilot

    So I guess we just ignore those in the BLM who call for calm, peace, and dialogue with police and others? Kind of like blaming Islam for all the “terrorist” attacks around the world. Same logic. You take those on the fringe of the movement and act like it’s the norm. I’m sure there are many in the BLM that are disgusted by the chants, but of course you conveniently ignore those more prevalent feelings. You act like BLM has no place in society, that everything’s peachy as far as relations between law enforcement and the black community.

    Yes BLM is an aggressive movement, but so are police tactics. Does that make it wrong? I never said BLM didn’t have flaws, I just feels it bring into discussion what’s been going on for a long time. A more aggressive movement than BLM? How about Sea Shepard. They endanger the lives of humans who never killed or even posed a threat to another human being. Yet many people think Sea Shepard is made up of a bunch of angels who can do no wrong.

  • KamikaziPilot

    Hyperbole? No basis? There’s tons of evidence that blacks are discriminated against not just on the street by police but by many stages of the justice system (sentencing, drug arrests, juvenile justice). It’s almost impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that racial bias exists but there are so many studies to suggest it, it’s reasonable to believe it does exist, not to mention I’ve seen it personally (against all races). So in WWII when the Jews were exterminated I guess you could say everyone of all races were exterminated and be done with it? Or how about those blacks that are racist against whites and asians? Can you just say people are violent towards each other and be done with it? That’s your logic. You seem to want to deliberately ignore the differences due to race and culture.

  • TN P

    And what evidence did you gather when you decide your bias choice? I suppose every Black dude that gets pulled over are ALL innocent and WHITE cops aren’t allowed to pull them over anymore?

    The world is full of prejudice. It appears that whenever something happens to those “innocent” Black people, people like you LOVE to quickly jump on the band wagon to back them up, but when it comes to Hispanics, Asians, etc. These same stupid protesters aren’t there to fight for them. They’re just a bunch of bias hypocrites. Are you one of them too?

  • I suppose every Black dude that gets pulled over are ALL innocent and WHITE cops aren’t allowed to pull them over anymore?

    Again, you resort to sweeping generalizations and hyperbole, which I think betrays some faulty and reductionist reasoning on your part. Not all Black people are — or look like — criminals. Not all Black people who get pulled over by police are innocent of any crime. But this latter point does not justify or rationalize racial profiling or excessive police violence. What you write amounts to a distraction from those larger issues by use of absurdist hyperbole.

    The world is full of prejudice.

    Does that mean we should accept it when we are confronted by it, particularly when that prejudice costs human life?

    people like you LOVE to quickly jump on the band wagon to back them up, but when it comes to Hispanics, Asians, etc. These same stupid protesters aren’t there to fight for them.

    That’s factually untrue. There is a long, more than a century long history of interracial coalition building on the topic of anti-racism. The fight to earn justice for Vincent Chin, the victim of a Detroit racialized hate crime murder in Detroit in the 1980’s which served as a watershed moment for the Asian American Movement, involved work by Black civil rights leaders including Jesse Jackson. Your accusation of hypocrisy suggests you are unaware of the history of anti-racism social movements in America, and I suggest you take some time to learn it.

  • Skeet Duran

    I don’t recall ever hearing innocent people get shot just for being innocent.

    It happens at least 5% of the time actually.

    1) You resembled a robbery suspect, and the officer shot you dead. Innocent or not?

    2) You are licensed to carry a weapon, and the officer shot you dead. Innocent or not?

    3) An Asian person cannot speak English, cannot understand the officer’s commands and therefore cannot comply. The officer shot the Asian person dead. Innocent or not?

    #1 and #2 actually happened in the Philando Castile’s case.

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity or background is not up for debate.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.