No, Pro-Liang Protests Were Not the Largest or Most Impactful Asian American Protest Movements Ever

April 20, 2016
Books from my bookshelf that document a written history of AAPI protest.
A selection of books from my bookshelf that document a written history of AAPI protest and active resistance.

I hate to be that person but I think it’s time we set the record straight, especially since a bunch of journalists are already speculating about the impact(s) of pro-Peter Liang protests on the outcome of today’s hearing: This year’s pro-Liang protests marches are neither the first, nor the largest, nor the most impactful protest movements organized by the Asian American community.

Let me be clear: I do not mean to dismiss the achievement of this year’s pro-Liang protests. It is never easy to organize a nationwide demonstration, never mind one that is able to attract 15,000 in a single city and thousands more nationwide. I may not agree (like, at all) with Liang’s supporters, but no one can or should scoff at the community organizing work it took to make these protests materialize. And, quite clearly, these protests, letter writing campaigns, and online petitions had an impact: after DA Ken Thompson said he would not seek prison time for Liang, Judge Danny Chun today reduced Liang’s conviction to a lesser charge before sentencing him to 5 years probation and 800 hours community service for his killing of Akai Gurley.

Liang’s supporters will be celebrating today. But, in the interest of an accurate representation of AAPI history, those celebrations must be presented alongside an honest contextualization of AAPI’s long history of vociferous protest movements.

Many of Liang’s supporters have expressed their belief  that this year’s pro-Liang rallies are the largest or most impactful protest marches ever organized out of the AAPI community. My Facebook is rife with such statements from Liang’s supporters, and they are as galvanizing a sentiment as they are untrue.

Nonetheless, this talking point is so oft-repeated that it has permeated into mainstream media, where it has become unintentionally legitimized through the writing of many including Jay Caspian Kang — a thoughtful journalist whose work I deeply respect — in a well-cited essay for the New York Times. In that piece, Kang called the Liang protests “the most pivotal moment in the Asian-American community since the Rodney King riots.” In an interview with NPR today, Kang elaborated saying: “It’s rare to see Asian Americans protest anything… We don’t quite have a language of protest. There’s no real written history of Asian American protest in the United States.” Kang went on to say that outside of the fight for reparations following Japanese American incarceration, most would struggle to find an instance of an Asian American protest movement because most were either “ignored” or “very small.”

Readers and listeners of a narrative like this might be lead to believe that the AAPI community is largely politically passive, and that we have rarely organized any large-scale protest movement that has brought about any sort of significant change; or, readers might assume that if such protests ever took place, a written record of those events does not exist rendering them inconsequential to time. Yet, a quick perusal of my bookshelf offers a compelling counter-narrative. In fact, one finds many instances of massive rallies and protest marches organized out of our community drawing tens of thousands of AAPI protesters.

Organizers of the Delano Grape Strike (1965)
Organizers of the Delano Grape Strike (1965)

We can draw from throughout AAPI history for examples. Most of us easily remember the nationwide protests that repeatedly attracted tens of thousands of Asian Americans to march in the streets in multiple cities across the country for justice for Vincent Chin. Outraged that Chin’s killers would receive no jail time and only a $3000 fine for the commission of a hate-motivated murder, Asian Americans were spurred to action in the 1980’s. But these protests were, by no means, the only massive protest marches organized by the AAPI community.

In the late 1800’s and early 1900’s, Asian American agricultural workers (including Chinese, Japanese and Korean labourers) repeatedly engaged in strikes for better wages and working conditions. In just one example documented by Ron Takaki in Strangers From a Different Shore, 8,000 predominantly Japanese American farm workers organized a series of twenty strikes on the plantations of Hawaii, an incident of particular significance because Hawaii was home to only 60,000 Japanese people total in that year. In case you’re struggling with that math, a whopping 14% of Hawaii’s total population of Japanese people united in protest and walked off the job in 1900.

Seventy years later, the modern labour movement was indelibly impacted by the success of the 1965 Delano grape strike, which was initiated by Filipino American table grape growers under the banner of the Agricultural Workers Organizing Committee. Led by Filipino American labour leaders Larry Itliong and Philip Vera Cruz, AWOC joined forces with Cesar Chavez’s National Farmworkers’ Association to form the United Farm Workers (UFW), which launched years of protest marches, boycotts and non-violent demonstrations that eventually won better wages for 10,000 of the country’s lowest-paid agricultural workers.

Members of Local 23-25 march through Chinatown during the rally (June 24, 1982 or July 15, 1982). Images Unlimited
Members of Local 23-25 march through Chinatown during the rally (June 24, 1982 or July 15, 1982). (Photo credit: Images Unlimited)

Twenty years after the Delano grape protests, 20,000 Chinatown garment workers — most of them Chinese American women — joined forces to walk off the job demanding a fair contract with their employers. They won a new contract within hours, and according to Cornell University left a lasting impact on the IGLWU union and NYC’s Chinatown.

CAPTION: A 1983 protest march in downtown Detroit after Ronald Ebens and Michael Nitz are found guilty of manslaughter, not murder, in the Vincent Chin case. (Photo credit: Corky Lee)
CAPTION: A 1983 protest march in downtown Detroit after Ronald Ebens and Michael Nitz are found guilty of manslaughter, not murder, in the Vincent Chin case. (Photo credit: Corky Lee)
Asian Americans protest the Vincent Chin murder. (Photo credit: Corky Lee)
Asian Americans protest the Vincent Chin murder. (Photo credit: Corky Lee)

Labour rights are not the only issue that has galvanized the AAPI community. In fact, the Peter Liang rallies are not even the largest New York City-area rallies to attract predominantly Asian American protesters on the topic of excessive police force. In 1975, 20,000 Asian Americans took to the streets in New York City demanding justice in the suspected racial profiling and excessively brutal police beating of 27-year-old Chinese American architect Peter Yew during a routine traffic stop.

Protesters protest the beating of Peter Yew in 1975. (Photo credit: Corky Lee)
Protesters protest the beating of Peter Yew in 1975. (Photo credit: Corky Lee)

The difference, of course, is that in 1975, Chinese Americans were marching to end the excessive policing of communities of colour, not in defense of it.

We could go on, and on, and on citing AAPI protest movements — large and small — that have made a massive difference to the course of American and AAPI history. We could talk about I-Wor-Kuen and other Asian American radicals of the 1960’s. We could talk about the decades of student protests for AAPI Studies that continue to shake the Ivory Tower, resulting in numerous victories for ethnic studies programs over the years. We could mention this past year’s Thirty Meter Telescope protests, which successfully blocked desecration of land considered sacred by Native Hawaiians. We might note the nationwide coordinated protests of AAPI students against Abercrombie & Fitch stores in the early 2000’s, remarkable for being one of the nation’s first examples of activists using digital tools to facilitate on-the-ground community organizing.

We might even expand our definition of “protest movements” to include large-scale acts of resistance organized by the AAPI community that employ digital tools  — themselves an equally legitimate form of activism — rather than the more conventional street rally. If we were to consider also the politicized congregation of AAPIs on the streets of social media, we would find even more numerous examples in recent memory of progressive (and conservative) AAPIs agitating for change. We might remember, for example, the outcry from thousands of Japanese Americans around the country that single-handedly halted the sale of incarceration artifacts last year. Alongside that campaign, we might find countless digital protest movements that range in topics from media representation to affirmative action, and from environmental justice to reproductive rights — all occurring well within recent memory and many still ongoing.

Hopefully the point becomes clear: AAPIs have never been bystanders to social justice. This year’s impassioned rallies organized by some Chinese Americans might be politically notable, but they are not historically exceptional. AAPI’s have a long history of protest movements, and the written record of that resistance exists. Ignorance or erasure of that history by the mainstream does not occur because AAPI revolutionaries are irrelevant. Rather, I would venture that (in addition to mainstream ignorance of AAPI history) stories of the meek and generally apolitical Asian American compel for their implicit reinforcement of the Model Minority Myth.

This is also why it is imperative that this narrative be immediately and thoroughly dismantled.

The AAPI community cannot afford to forget our roots. After all, as Ron Takaki says: “All memory is political.” Contrary to model minority stereotypes, ours is a proud history of resistance; one that deserves better than being overlooked, ignored, or erased.

Update (4/20/16): This post has received minor restructuring and additional writing because it was originally written and published at 3AM in the morning and I was apparently punchy.

  • Skeet Duran

    Thanks for doing the research on this.

    I don’t think it’s about whether or not Asian Americans have the ability to revolutionize, this fact has proven throughout history in Asia as well from Thailand to Hong Kong to Vietnam, that Asians are not known to be model minorities nor stay shy of confrontations from massive rallies.

    The question has been about how well versed and educated are Asians or Asian Americans in the racial dynamic politics. A one blanket generalizing all Asian Americans into one basket doesn’t do justice. We have various levels of Asians in terms of political awareness in the context of racial relations. We know that throughout history in Asia, the sentimens for Blacks is not well received, or dark skin people were seen as peasants over there.

    The Asians in America are more westernized and therefore they understand the racial politics at a deeper level, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t noob members who don’t know what their doing. Just like the debacles that the Peter Liang protesters laid an egg when it came to understanding the treatments of Black Lives? You, yourself said the 200,000 petition signees were made bad judgements that undermined black lives. Are AsAm well versed with racial relations or are they just make mistakes due to ignorance?

    Yes 20K protested and 200K signed the petitions for Peter, but was it the right thing to do?

  • sister_h

    “Asia is a large homogeneous continent and societies with few people knowledgeable about racial relations nor racial discrimination.”

    I like your post, but I want to correct this misunderstanding. Asia is a huge continent and there is incredible diversity of ethnicity, language, culture, etc., and there has always been racism in Asia. In Japan, for example, Japanese citizens of Chinese and Korean origin are discriminated against, and there are at least a couple of other indigenous ethnic groups there that are very oppressed and reviled.

  • Skeet Duran

    Yes you’re right, “intra-ethnic” discrimination is just as severe and oppressive as racial discrimination. Asia’s history has been filled with “intra-ethnic” discrimination up to this present day. Currently, I hate how the communist Chinese is bullying all their smaller neighbor countries in South China Sea.

    With Asians been through “intra-ethnic” discrimination, does that make Asians in Asia automatically understand racial discrimination between the three main races, where White supremacy oppresses Blacks and Asians?

  • Mohan

    I was thinking something along these lines. I sometimes wonder if Asian American activism is forgotten so quickly because it bolsters the model minority myth. “Look at those blacks, so uppity, the Asians never act like that.” This article touches, indirectly, on the apparent ignorance some people have about the history of American racial politics. It’s quite sad.

    Of course, I don’t want to make this into some sort of competition and I have a lot of respect for anyone who stands up for their rights. Hopefully if we get the word out we can work together towards a more productive union of minority rights activism.

  • Mohan

    Unfortunately, as can be seen in America, people often have to be explicitly taught about these things, otherwise they are often pretty useless at it. Not to mention the fact that most of the major nations in that area subscribe to very outdated ideas of racial nationalism (Korea, Japan especially) and eugenics (China and Singapore). So I think there’s fertile ground for racial prejudice to grow in.

  • Ryan Clarke

    Is fighting for commensurate sentencing the right thing to do? When would it not be the right thing to do? Certain people in the Asian community refused to characterize the incident as an accident; both the prosecutor and the judge saw the facts of the case and decided the incident was far less severe than certain “Asian activists” were making it out to be. Asians fought for Gurley non-stop but never fought for Ryo Oyamada when he was killed by a cop. Where were all these Asian Gurley-supporters then? Were they in mass protests? Somehow the ones who claim to fight for Asians are never there when they’re needed.

  • Skeet Duran

    When would it be the right thing to do?

    You’ve just answered this question.

    Mass protest for Peter who got zero prison sentence, or mass protest for Ryo Oyamada where his killer cop got away with murder.

    Easy answer isn’t it. Mass protest for Ryo would had been much less controversy than for Peter as well.

  • Over 100K signed a petition demanding accountability in Oyamada’s death. How, exactly, did Asian Americans “never fight” for Ryo Oyamada?

  • mmjames

    Hmmm in this case it was a black cop accidentally killing a young asian man who still had his whole life ahead of him. Where were all the asian american SJWs writing op-ed after op-ed about how Darren Ilardi should be facing jail time?

  • Skeet Duran

    John Ho, Johnnie Nakao, Hai Nguyen, and Yi Tzu Chen were all killed by police and there were no protests outraged about them. Why the victim Sureshbhai Patel only collected about 5000 signatures on two separate petitions?

    The key difference between protests for Peter Liang vs. protests for Asian victims against cop killers is … the former facilitates and promotes police brutality, whereas the latter promotes #AsianLivesMatter and #BlackLivesMatter.

  • Ryan Clarke

    It’s just too bad all these Asian activists who seem to intentionally confuse the facts of the Liang case weren’t out protesting the cop who killed Oyamada. They claim to be against police abuse after all.

  • Skeet Duran

    Look in the mirror, buddy.

  • Skeet Duran

    Look in the mirror, buddy.

  • NYCO’s

    Did you write anything about the Darrem Ilardi case on your site? I ask because I didn’t see any so I may have missed them if so.

  • NYCO’s

    Good post, Ryan. Completely agree

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity or background is not up for debate.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.