Judge Dismisses Case Against Police Officer Who Paralyzed Elderly Indian Grandfather

January 15, 2016
Alabama police officer Eric Parker who was accused of civil rights violations committed during the arrest of Sureshbhai Patel, which resulted in permanent paralysis of the elderly Indian grandfather. (Photo credit: AP / Brynn Anderson)
Alabama police officer Eric Parker who was accused of civil rights violations committed during the arrest of Sureshbhai Patel, which resulted in permanent paralysis of the elderly Indian grandfather. (Photo credit: AP / Brynn Anderson)

After a second trial ended in a mistrial due to jury deadlock late last year, a judge has now granted a motion of acquittal filed by defense attorneys to dismiss the case against Alabama police officer Eric Parker, who stood accused of using excessive force in his arrest of an elderly Indian grandfather in February of last year. Prosecutors had been seeking a third trial against the police officer.

Sureshbhai Patel, who was 57 at the time of the attack and who had just arrived in the United States to help care for his infant grandchild, was walking in the early morning of February 6, 2015, when he was approached by two police officers including Officer Parker. Police were responding to a call of a suspicious “skinny Black guy” in the area. Patel, who doesn’t speak much English, was detained and being handcuffed when dashcam video (after the jump) shows Parker suddenly slamming an otherwise cooperative and non-violent Patel to the pavement. The injury left the elderly man permanently paralyzed and reliant on a walker for mobility.

Parker’s defense claimed that the attack on Patel was justified because the elderly Indian man was not being compliant to officer’s directions to take his hands from his pockets. Prosecutors reiterated that Patel doesn’t speak English, and that his understanding of the officer’s instructions was likely limited; in addition, video appears to show Patel with his hands behind his back — and out of his pockets — at the time of the assault.

However, after a second jury failed to reach a consensus that Parker had violated Patel’s civil rights in using excessive force against him during the arrest, Judge Madeline Haikala issued a 92-page opinion throwing the case against Parker out. In her opinion, Haikala reportedly said that the prosecution had failed to demonstrate sufficient evidence against Parker that would eliminate all reasonable doubt of his guilt. Via the BBC:

“The court has no reason to expect a different result in a subsequent trial given the totality of the evidence that the parties have provided,” Ms Haikala wrote.

Recently unsealed court documents further show that privately, Haikala was extremely dismissive of the prosecution’s case against Parker. She admonished prosecutors for bringing up the possibility of racial bias influencing Parker’s actions when she apparently thought the case had nothing to do with race. Clearly, Judge Haikala has not properly considered the impact of implicit bias on the split-second decision-making of police.

Although Parker has been acquitted of the federal civil rights charges against him with this decision, a charge of third degree assault — a misdemeanor crime that carries a maximum of one year in jail — filed by the state of Alabama is still pending. State prosecutors had put the assault charge on hold to await the outcome of the federal civil rights case. With Judge Haikala’s decision, a conference to decide whether to go forward with the state charges against Parker has been scheduled for early February.

The Patel family has also filed a civil suit against Officer Eric Parker.

This final outcome for the federal charges against Parker are symptomatic of a structural problem in this country’s justice system. Although police officers must operate with a certain legal authority in order to perform their duties, the justice system goes too far in protecting police from being held accountable for actions that violate the powers of their office. On the flawed assumption that to prosecute and convict a cop who does their job badly would endanger the many cops who do their jobs well, our courts instead turn a blind eye to indefensible criminal behaviour. In so doing, our justice system fails Sureshbhai Patel, Tamir Rice, Eric GarnerSandra Bland, Fong Lee, and all the other victims of unjustified police violence — predominantly Black men and women — whose assailants routinely escape justice.

A GoFundMe page has been set up to receive donations for the Patel family, and has currently collected more than $200,000 dollars.

  • Stigz

    Garbage. This is what white privilege is.

  • DovSherman

    This reminds me of the Bou-Bou Phonesavanh case where the Sheriff claimed that the infant was at fault for the SWAT grenade that tore apart his face.

  • DovSherman

    This reminds me of the Bou-Bou Phonesavanh case where the Sheriff claimed that the infant was at fault for the SWAT grenade that tore apart his face.

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity or background is not up for debate.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.