Second Mistrial Declared in Police Beating of Sureshbhai Patel

November 5, 2015
Sureshbhai Patel enters the courthouse in the trial against his assailant, Alabama police officer Eric Parker, who paralyzed Patel following a routine pedestrian stop. (Photo credit: AP/Brynn Anderson)
Sureshbhai Patel enters the courthouse in the trial against his assailant, Alabama police officer Eric Parker, who paralyzed Patel following a routine pedestrian stop. (Photo credit: AP/Brynn Anderson)

I just can’t even right now.

A mistrial has once again been declared in the excessive force trial of Alabama police officer Eric Parker, who was caught on dashcam video in February violently slamming 57-year-old Sureshbhai Patel to the ground during a routine pedestrian stop. Parker testified that Patel posed a dangerous threat to the officer, but video appeared to show Patel motionless and compliant in the moments prior to the brutal tackle that left the elderly grandfather partially paralyzed.

A first trial against Parker ended in a mistrial in September after 10 male (and non-Black) jurists voted to acquit; the jury’s sole Black female members sided with Patel. For retrial, Parker’s attorneys elected to go with a “full xenophobia” defense strategy: in opening arguments presented last month, they blamed Patel’s limited English proficiency and his non-citizen status for his assault.

WHNT reported this week that after three days of deliberation, the jury in Parker’s trial has once again deadlocked. The jury was composed of 9 women and 3 menFour of the women are Black. It remains unclear what the breakdown of the votes were, but one thing remains certain based on the rhetoric presented by Parker’s defense: Parker’s actions were not on trial here, Patel’s Brownness is. Parker’s lawyers were not appealing to the jury’s sense of justice, they were appealing to the White jury members’ shared membership in Whiteness.

Such overtly racist line of reasoning further begs the question: how does racialized jury selection impact trial outcome. The second jury in the excessive force case against Eric Parker had strong representation of non-White individuals, but in a jury, it takes only one stubborn jury member to deadlock a vote. Stacking a jury with more jury members likely to be sympathetic to your reasoning — in this case, jury members more receptive to an argument about White identity politics — is likely to improve one’s odds for a mistrial or acquittal.

As mentioned, the first trial against Eric Parker — which resulted in a hung jury — consisted primarily of non-Black men. Only 16% of the jury included Black individuals, in a state where more than 1 in 4 residents are Black.

The practice of selecting or excluding jury members based on race is well-known and quietly practiced, if unconstitutional. We know that all-White jury members are more likely to convict Black defendants. It seems also possible (if still undocumented) that predominantly White juries might be more likely to acquit White defendants, and that defense attorneys may use their influence over jury selection to stack juries with racially sympathetic members.

This is, in fact, the alarming situation we are currently facing in another trial against another White-passing (if, mixed race Asian American) police officer. Former police officer Daniel Holtzclaw is charged with rape, assault and kidnapping committed against 13 Black women and girls. The majority of the jury members in Holtzclaw’s trial are male; all are White. Three Black men were among the jury members rejected from the pool of eligible jury members.

Our justice system depends upon guilt being decided by a jury of one’s peers, yet rarely do defendants face a jury that is truly representative of our multicultural society. Jury pools are legally required to be demographically representative of the surrounding jurisdiction, but jury selection still gives attorneys broad power to rig the racial makeup of a jury. In excluding people of colour by race from sitting on juries, society says that people of colour aren’t really “our peers”. People of colour are fundamentally disempowered from deciding justice, particularly against those accused of committing specific crimes that affect our communities. Justice too often goes undone.

It remains unclear — but unlikely — that prosecutors will seek a third excessive force trial against Eric Parker in the beating of Sureshbhai Patel.

Read also: Another Mistrial Declared For Alabama Cop Who Paralyzed Indian Grandfather (NBC News Asian America)

  • trer24

    The Jury selection process in this country is a sham and serves only as an arena for attorneys to practice their gamesmanship.

  • pzed

    Just a note, the local news station’s name is actually WHNT and not WNHT. But yeah, other than that, I pretty much agree this was a horrible miscarriage of justice.

  • Thanks! Fixed!

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.


Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.