Anti-Indictment Rallies for NYPD Officer Peter Liang Draw Smaller Than Expected Crowd in NYC

April 27, 2015
Protesters march across the Brooklyn Bridge protesting the indictment of NYPD officer Peter Liang, who fatally shot unarmed civilian Akai Gurley in November 2014. (Photo credit: Tom Miuccio / PIX11News)
Protesters march across the Brooklyn Bridge protesting the indictment of NYPD officer Peter Liang, who fatally shot unarmed civilian Akai Gurley in November 2014. (Photo credit: Tom Miuccio / PIX11News)

After over a month of build-up, a “National Day of Protest” that organizers said would involve coordinated rallies opposing the indictment of NYPD rookie police officer Peter Liang occurred last Sunday. Officer Liang was indicted earlier this year by a grand jury on manslaughter and reckless endangerment charges after he fatally shot unarmed civilian Akai Gurley in a darkened stairwell during an unsanctioned vertical patrol late last year.

Last month, thousands of Chinese Americans took to the streets to oppose Liang’s indictment, claiming that the criminal charges against Liang were unfair, and a form of “racial scapegoating”. However, many other Asian Americans (including myself) support Officer Liang’s indictment as a necessary outcome if we are to expect greater police accountability and an end to racial profiling and police brutality. Last week, the Committee Against Anti-Asian Violence (CAAAV) organized an open letter of support for Officer Liang’s indictment and solidarity with the #BlackLivesMatter movement; over 50 AAPI organizations (including this blog) and more than 200 AAPI individuals — including several community leaders — signed on.

Over the weekend, anti-indictment protesters were scheduled to rally in cities ranging from New York to Los Angeles. In the wake of the growing coverage of incidents of police brutality — including the recent shooting death of unarmed civilian Walter Scott which resulted in criminal charges for the police officer in charge — I was curious to see what impact these recent events might have on Liang’s supporters, whose rhetoric appeared to hinge largely on the assertion that police officers should have the unmitigated right to shoot unarmed Black men and women without consequence.

Originally, organizers claimed that over 6000 protesters were expected to attend Sunday’s series of national protests, with over 3000 anticipated to take to the streets in New York City alone.

However, when the time came this past Sunday, local news outlet Pix11 reported that “hundreds” (but not thousands) of protesters met at Cadman Plaza Park in Brooklyn at 2pm on Sunday, and marched across the Brooklyn Bridge to Manhattan’s Chinatown area (pictured above). A Facebook event set up for the protest listed a mere 6 attendees, although protesters were likely using other Chinese-language social media platforms to organize the rally. Protesters mingled with pedestrians and tourists on the Brooklyn Bridge, holding American flags and signs that read “Accident =/= Crime” and “Justice for Peter Liang”. While photographs are not clear in assessing the size of the rally, turnout for this event appears to be far lower than the originally anticipated 3000.

In California a planned protest in Los Angeles was waylaid after organizers were unable to obtain a permit for the protest, originally scheduled for Saturday. Rally organizer, Ray Chen, who is part of the Board of Directors for HQH Chinese American Equalization Association, told a group of journalists last Thursday that the protest permit was cancelled by the LAPD on Tuesday, 24 hours after it was originally granted. Chen claimed that the permit denial was a violation of Asian Americans’ First Amendment rights.

“What the LAPD did is a direct violation of the Constitution,” Chen said. “They’ve violated our rights, more specifically they’ve violated our rights to free speech and peacefully assemble.”

Chen and Hui called on Asian Americans to stand up for their rights.

“An Asian-American organization has been bullied,” Chen added. “What do we need to do to be taken seriously? We are not second-class citizens.”

Police officials contacted by Pasadena Star News said the permit for the rally was withdrawn because it conflicted with a pre-existing street festival, Fiesta Broadway, which drew crowds of nearly 10,000 people (and which was originally expected to attract more than 30,000 attendees) to downtown Los Angeles that day.

The ACLU says that police and government officials are allowed to place “nondiscriminatory and narrowly drawn ‘time, place and manner’ restrictions  on the exercise of First Amendment rights”, which includes requiring a permit for any march that uses public gathering spaces. The ACLU further notes that denial of a permit would not have prevented the aforementioned rally from taking place so long as protesters could stay on sidewalks, obey traffic signals, and allow for other normal pedestrian traffic. While I’m sympathetic with organizers frustrated with the last minute cancellation of their event permit, it does not actually appear as if the First Amendment Rights of this group were violated.

Last month, supporters of Officer Liang also said that rallies were planned to take place this weekend in many other cities around the country. However, as of this morning, there exists no coverage of any such events taking place in mainstream news.

Read More: V. Gunawan has Storified the controversy here.

Did you like this content? Please consider becoming a patron of Reappropriate and get exclusive access to the brand new Reappropriate vlog!

  • Jie Li

    For the 2009 accidental shooting death of a Black by a White officer
    when patrolling a housing project, why would a mostly Black grand jury
    clear the office from any wrong doing? And now the same Blacks would
    want to send Liang to jail for 15 years? Blacks discriminate Asians.
    They think Whites lives matter, not Asians. In another supposedly
    accidental shooting of a Black man Harris by a White volunteer deputy, I
    read through all the comments on Huffington Post expecting I would
    see some black folks screaming “murder!” “modern day lynching!” like
    they did in Asian officer Liang’s case. But surprisingly I didn’t see
    any. Maybe that police shooting victim is less innocent than Gurley
    since he was involved in a violent altercation with the cops? But that
    cop was also less innocent than Liang, since Liang did not even shoot
    Gurley, but the wall. And he and his partner did not realize someone had
    got shot as a result of Liang’s accidental discharge. Maybe the Black
    folks think the White lives are more of value than that of Asians? Is
    that the same reason that they tend to target Asians for violence? If
    the Black folks practice racism themselves, what grounds do they have to
    ask the Whites not to discriminate them?

  • Jie Li

    You may be the next Peter Liang, sent to jail by the Blacks now you are supporting.

  • Michelle Kirkwood

    Uh—what? Big assumption on your part—you don’t know what black people think. The officer screwed up, shot and killed an innocent person in an area where he wasn’t even supposed to be patrolling. He deserves to be punished for it,period.

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.