imMEDIAte Justice hopes for more cats (and less catcalls) in video series inclusive of WOC

December 5, 2014

catcall-for-what

Street harassment is a daily reality for many women and LGBTQ individuals, however it skyrocketed to the spotlight earlier this year when a video commissioned by group Hollaback claimed to document over a hundred separate instances of street harassment as experienced by a woman as she walked the streets of New York City for ten hours while being recorded by hidden camera. That video sparked a national conversation on street harassment — what it is and why it is damaging — but the video was also criticized for its clumsy treatment of race: the woman in the video appears visibly White while nearly every documented harassment is committed by a man of colour. Hollaback has been accused of subtly reinforcing anti-Black stereotypes through shoddy methodology and selective editing: most of the examples ultimately included in the video were recorded in Harlem. Hollaback responded:

Hollaback! understands that harassment is a broad problem committed by a broad spectrum of individuals across lines of race, location and class. We know from the 8,000 stories we’ve collected on ihollaback.org that there is no single profile for a harasser, and harassment comes in many different forms. We are deeply invested in a movement that is multiracial, gender inclusive and incorporates place-based leadership specific to each locale.

But, to paraphrase Ta-Nehisi Coates, do we really want people of colour rendered by the same hand that failed to see the problematic racial dynamics of the initial video? “Invisibility is bad,” Coates says, “caricature is worse.”

That’s why I fully support this project by imMEDIAte Justice (@imMEDIAteFilms), a WOC-run organization that hopes to specifically empower WOC and LGBTQ individuals to tell our own stories regarding street harassment.

Earlier this year, imMEDIAte Justice encouraged a multiracial group of teenagers to express themselves regarding street harassment, racial profiling and homophobia which culminated in the above 1-minute video parodying Lil Jon’s “Turn Out For What” with a hundred stuffed cats. (I really want to know what happened to all the cats after the shooting of this video. I hope they found good homes.)

ImMEDIAte Justice engaged the teens and focused their energies by inviting in Hollywood professionals to help create the student film, including The Daniels (director of the original “Turn Out For What” music video), singer Hollis (who collaborated with Macklemore in “White Walls“) and musician Yazmin Monet Williams. Feministing reports:

The girls learned that their experiences were not unique but social as everyone had an experience to contribute. Under the leadership of Tani Ikeda, ImMEDIAte Justice’s founder, the girls collaborated on a story that would be inspiring and hopeful. “It was incredible to see how the process of making the ‘Catcall for What?!’ music video transformed a painful experience we’ve all faced into something that gave us agency,” Ikeda said.

Ikeda, who is the Executive Director of imMEDIAte Justice, is also an awesome artist in her own right; she recently directed this amazing music video for “Dum Ditty Dumb” by Crystal Kay, which I loved when it first launched but didn’t post about on this blog because I suck. Pause for intermission now and watch this awesome video. Then, I promise it’s back to your regularly scheduled discussion of intersectional identity politics.

Ridiculously cool, right?

Anyways, the ladies of imMEDIAte Justice have made a ton of other cool videos, many focused on WOC identity, and are now looking for your help to help keep the company running, and inspiring teenaged girls to explore their feminism and challenge street harassment. The group has created an IndieGOGO campaign, and are hoping to raise $5,000 to help fund their video series, which they hope will center young women of colour and LGBTQ voices.

imMEDIAte Justice writes:

Why Is It Important To Create This Video Series?

1) It centers young women.

Adolescent girls are often harassed, because men are attracted to their youth. This also makes them incredibly vulnerable to predators. If we want to combat catcalling, we have to give visibility to everyone who is affected by it—especially young girls and women. If they are the individuals most affected by it, then they should be the individuals included in the conversation on how to end it.

2) It centers people of color.

Women of color from all backgrounds often speak on being “exoticized” by men when being catcalled and harassed. This is a form of oppression that objectifies women at the intersection of race and gender. But street harassment is not always about sexualizing the victim. It can also include comments on race, ethnicity, age, ability, and other types of identities.

So please, take a minute to donate just $25 or more to imMEDIAte Justice’s IndieGoGo campaign, and help fill the world with more cats, and less catcalls.

  • disqus_uY4qdf1Xbx

    Are you against the street harassment you watched in NYC or not? First street harassment of women is bad. But then, because most of the men doing it in the video were black, it is a racist caricaturization of these poor victimized men. It is what it is. Brothers do most of the catcalling in NYC. Don’t shy away from the truth all of a sudden just because it doesn’t fit the narrative in your head. If you are against street harassment, don’t make excuses for the men involved, regardless of their color.

  • Tani Ikeda

    Thank you so much for writing this wonderful piece about imMEDIAte Justice! It is awesome!

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity or background is not up for debate.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.