Reappropriate: The Podcast – Ep. 10 | Mismatch Theory

This episode was recorded two weeks ago but for a variety of reasons I didn’t have time to publish it! This is episode 10 of Reappropriate: The Podcast, and it features guest Snoopy Jenkins (@snoopyjenkins) and I tackling the problems with the oft-cited pseudo-scientific theory of college mismatch.

You can view the podcast above or listen to the audio only version at the bottom of this post. To subscribe to Reappropriate: The Podcast, you can subscribe on YouTube or through the iTunes store.

In the episode, we mention that we will be writing more on the subject of Mismatch Theory to accompany this podcast episode. Please check back on this blog over the next few weeks to see those posts when they are published.

Check back later today for episode 11 of Reappropriate: The Podcast!

Did you like this post? Please support Reappropriate on Patreon!
  • Junweiwei

    This is funny. Two academics who want to show us that standardized tests does not measure merit – so let us implement affirmative action to get meritocracy.

    My counter-argument is – it does not matter if affirmative action promotes meritocracy or not – or if the current system promote meritocracy.

    In general meritocracy is an amoral social order, because you cannot assign people more rights and basic goods with the birth lottery. This applies to birth into rich families, but also birth with good genetics. What matters for ethical judgement are the consequences and the free will of taking sides for one party or the other.

    From the standpoint of rule consequentialism – it is always better to have admission policies which favor transnational minorities rather than white majorities and inner minorities {Black Americans, Native Americans}. We live in a world of global capitalism with core regions and peripheries.

    Transnational diasporas have family ties, cultural ties, trade ties and knowledge spillover which connects the core with the peripheries – there are always population exchanges with changing stocks of entrepreneurs, politicians, journalists, scientists, diplomats,…with the diaspora as temporary place.

    The Chinese diaspora have a rich history of supporting revolutions and social reforms. The fall of Imperial China was a project of the Chinese diaspora. The combat against colonial rule in South East Asia was a project of Chinese diaspora. The Cuban revolution was supported by Chinese diasporas.

    Black Americans have a very bad historical record of politcal merit. The decolonization was a practically a result of the hostility of the USA to European powers. After the Russian and Chinese revolutions the Soviet Union and Red China became the principal supporters of decolonization. The decolonization of India was greatly advanced with the return of Ghandi from South Africa.

    Transnational diasporas have the ability to spread political ideas. Black Americans who are descendants of slaves do not know where they came from. You cannot compare the performance of Chinese, Indian, Vietnamese diasporas political achievements who liberate hundred millions of people with the local restricted black civil rights movement who want to make American capitalism better for blacks.

    The knowledge spillover of Chinese American, Indian American, Taiwanese American,…and Chinese foreign students, Indian foreign students and Taiwanese foreign students have been validated by economists who extracted patent datas from the US patent offices. Ethnic inventors like to cite each other papers and patents, because they develop social ties at universities and research laboratories and convert them into patents. We have entire innovation cluster in Taiwan and Banglalore who serve return migration of ethnic entrepreneurs. The new combinations of factors capital, labour and technology raise the entire maritime trade volume in the Pacific Rim and the technological upgrade results in better jobs for the fast urbanization of th Pacific Rim nations. India’s poor peasantry and hungry poor is frequently overlooked, because whites like to focussed on blacks since the black civil right movement. But actually there are a comparable number of hungry poor in India and Subsahara Africa.

    There is a similar case with Latin Americans. The entire Mexican province of Zacatecas is dependent on Mexican American remittance flow which have the order of an entire annual budget. The merit of transnational politics are not very spectacular, but in general diasporas remittances are a kind of macroeconomic insurance for peripheral economies who cannot get a rating note above BBB to acess international capital markets. They get foreign currency with exports, diaspora tourism, remittances, energy exports.

    The general effect of the free macroeconomic insurance effects of transnational diasporas smooth the provision of public goods across borders, because peripheral nations use foreign currency to build infrastructure, education facilities,…This is an aggregate effect of family solidarity in times of economic crisis and the geographic distributions among local labour markets which have weak correlations with income risk in migration sending regions.

    Black Americans have in the majority in the USA localized families who cannot influenced the growth paths of the kin nations of transnational diasporas and I doubt that there educational performance even influence the American GDP.

    There are of course exceptions with Haitian Blacks, because we have evidence that Haitian Blacks remitted money when natural disaster occured and help Haiti – a nation which cannot afford a disaster insurance. Because of the similarity of Haitian blacks (generally Caribean Blacks) to Asian Americans these groups are naturally allies for Asian Americans because they belong to the same social type of minorities.

    Similar effects are reported with the case of diasporas communities from Subsahara Africa in France in times of drought who remitted money to provide relief and enhance the damand functions and foreign currency of the disaster kin state to provide emergency help for the hungry ones.

    So there are actually a political divide between transnational diasporas who are interested in transnational justice and the majority of Black Americans with no diaspora identities who are certainly disadvantaged in white America, but they are also very nationalistic and proud of the USA and nativism and anti-immigrant sentiment are easily plant in the Black American mind.

    The political tasks of transnational communities is to spread political education and historical knowledge about transnational history, revolution history and transnational labour activism.

    Black civil right movement and their Asian American and Chicano spin-offs were only an insignificant episode of the transnational histories of diasporas. Step back and look at the bigger picture and trace the co-evolution of diasporas and modern nation states. Not Black Americans are the greatest performer in racial equality, transnational diasporas are actually the ones who help to build the modern world.

    Hence we have every incentive to help other transnational diasporas to make a difference in history. Black Americans will always embrace and defend the American empire, if they get the chance to make career in the system. On the contrary, the alliance with the American empire with US-based diasporas is a temporal alliance to balance other powers in the kin states. Black American have serious limits in their political ideology and cannot provide an actionable framework to advance the majority of humanity and workers.