Canada cancels investor visas: modern Chinese Exclusion, or a sign that Canadian citizenship isn’t for sale?

February 12, 2014
A boy holds up Chinese and Canadian flags (photo credit: Vancouver Sun)
A boy holds up Chinese and Canadian flags (photo credit: Vancouver Sun)

Although most avenues of legal citizenship to North America involves skill- or job-based visas, one of the lesser-known avenues of immigration to Canada and the US involves visas that are informally referred to as investor visas (a class that I was unaware existed until today). In brief, wealthy foreign nationals — those with a net worth in the millions — have the option to apply for a special visa status if they agree to loan the American government $500,000 (or, $800,000 if you’re trying to immigrate to Canada) for a fixed period; in return, these “investor nationals” are granted permanent residency with an option to apply for citizenship.

Or, in other words, for wealthy foreigners, American and Canadian citizenship is for sale, and the cost is a paltry half a million dollars. Or, rather it’s actually free — the money is returned to the visa holder (interest-free) after three to five years.

As someone who has been entrenched in the American visa system as a legal temporary resident for nearly 15 years, the existence of this visa program frustrates. Whereas my presence in this country is dependent upon annual proof that I am both highly-trained and am providing an ongoing contribution to this country; and, whereas my presence in this country is further characterized by interminably long wait times and confusing red tape; the idea that American and Canadian citizenship is for sale — but only if you’re part of the 1% — chafes.

It’s not just the notion that these visa holders are required to offer no further proof of their appeal to America than the size of their wallet, but I’m also surprised to find that they received near-automatic permanent residency, a status that technically-trained prospective immigrants typically have to wait 5 or more years to receive (if they’re lucky).

On the flip side, however, there’s something to be said about attracting wealthy permanent immigrants to a country like Canada (or America) with a growing debt burden associated with the cost of social services and entitlements. A half a million dollar pricetag per individual (plus dependents, if you’re trying to immigrate into Canada; America requires separate applications for dependents) for citizenship adds up quickly; further, attracting wealthy immigrants to set up shop in your country encourages further investment into the country in the form of business dealings and large tax payments. Given the apparent ease and lax requirements for this visa status, it’s not surprising that it would be highly popular for wealthy foreigners.

Indeed, in a recent expose, the South China Morning Post reported that more than 70% of Canada’s 50,000+ applicants for these investor visas are from mainland China; this has contributed to the vastly disproportionate influx of Asian immigrants from China versus other parts of Asia to parts of Canada.

Just a week after that article, Canada announced it was cancelling its investor visa program, leaving roughly 40,000 pending applications from Chinese applicants in the lurch. Canada — which also stopped accepting applicants in 2012 due to backlog — announced it would be returning all fees.

In justification of its decision, Canada stated that the program “significantly undervalued Canadian permanent residence” and wasn’t demonstrated to be significantly contributing to either the federal government’s coffers or to the Canadian economy.

I’m of mixed feelings about this turn-of-affairs. On the one hand, I dislike separate — and easier — pathways for the world’s wealthy; this was a clear example of wealth privilege. But, on the other hand, one must wonder why the program was scrapped today. Why now? Can we really believe that just days after a report that the program was heavily-used by Chinese nationals that the Canadian government realized the program was insolvent?

I can’t help but get a whiff of Chinese Exclusion in America — exclusionary immigration laws that had nearly-identical parallels in Canada — and the tactics used by both the American federal government and by state governments to write laws that appeared race-neutral, but that in both writing and implementation disproportionately disenfranchised Chinese residents or other “undesirables”. The further possibility that Canada’s decision to scrap their “investor visa” program was influenced by the public being made aware of how this “pathway to citizenship” was being utilized predominantly by Chinese immigrants solidifies the parallel.

But, perhaps there’s hope for these wealthy Chinese nationals? The American version of the “investor visa” program has a far lower price tag — only $500,000 US, far lower than the UK, Australia, and even Portugal. And while dependents can’t be brought along with a wealthy investor, the wait time for this visa is probably substantially shorter than it was in Canada: last year, only 6500 foreign nationals applied to buy their way into this country, and there are no signs that America is contemplating an end to the program.

Since Canada clearly thinks it’s got enough wealthy Chinese people living in their country, maybe America’s about to see some of those 40,000 Chinese one-percenters turn their sights here?

  • Yun Xu

    It’s obviously exclusion. You’re talking about politicians here.

    EVERYTHING is for sale at the right price for the “right” buyers.

  • That’s the problem — is it obviously exclusion? Investor visas make me really uncomfortable, so I’d probably campaign against them under normal circumstances. Here, it’s not clear whether the canceling is based on principle — there has been backlash against this visa class in all countries that have a program like this — or based on the race of the applicants applying.

    I don’t think it’s all that cut-and-dry and would like to hear why you think it’s a clear example of exclusion.

  • tom

    US program is different than the Canadian’s. The US requires you to invest the half million dollar into actual businesses, hire at least 10 US citizen as employees within two years (so it will cost more than just half million). Yes, residency is for sale, but at least the US requires you to use the money to stimulate domestic economy, in other words, they make you spend it, not a loan like Canada’s.

  • Yun Xu

    Historically, policies are created to benefit those at the top and/or to pacify the population to prevent dissent.

    Fairness breaks a forceful entry occasionally.

    IF it’s NOT money for those at the top then the reason for the cancellation is likely angry citizens.

    Why else would governments in deficit stop taking easy money?

  • tom
  • Yun Xu

    The one other reason is their calculations were off and the policy made made a net loss – social, monetary, instability, etc.

  • Tom, thank you SO much for the clarification. I figured there had to be some reason why the US’ numbers were far lower. I still feel really antsy about “throw money at citizenship and it will stick”, but at least it’s not so obviously a tactic for exploiting wealthy immigrants to make the federal government solvent.

  • Monkey King

    Yeah Canada’s investor scheme is well known to Hong Kongers.

    1) The UK and China sign the Sino-British Joint Declaration in 1984. During the negotiations, Deng Xiaoping made Margaret Thatcher bend over and take it without any lube.

    2) Knowing that China will just take complete control of HK, HKers panicked and thought that their city will be sucked into a Communist hellhole in 1997, and began looking for a way to get the fuck out.

    3) The UK said fuck you, we’re not granting you citizenship. Getting into the US was, at this point, like trying to merge a 6-lane highway into one lane.

    4) Then Canada said hey wait, we could use more money and people. So in 1986 it started welcoming HKers who could pay their way in.

    5) Thus modern Vancouver and Toronto was born.

  • The Canadian Immigrant Investor Program closed its doors to 65000 immigrant investors. 70% of the Canadian program applicants are from China. Learn More from http://www.high-net-worth-immigration.com

  • klainlez1

    Attention,
    Dear Sir/Madam,
    I am a registered private money lender Apply for a quick and convenient
    loan to pay off bills and to start a
    new financing your projects at a cheapest interest rate of 3%. Do
    contact us today with loan amount
    needed as our minimum loan offer is 1,000.00 to
    any choice of loan amount.I am
    certified ,registered and legit lender.You can
    contact me today if you are interested in getting
    this loan, contact me for more information about
    the loan process, process like the loan terms and
    conditions and how the loan will be transferred to
    you. I need your urgent response if you are
    interested. honestloan10@gmail.

  • klainlez1

    Are You In Need Of A Private Or Business Loans At 2% Rate For Various Purposes? If Yes; Contact us with this details below take note we give out from $20,000.00USD to 10million USD
    Full Name:
    Amount Needed:
    Duration:
    Country
    Cell No:
    Sex:
    contact us via email fasterloanservice@gmail.com
    Best Regards
    Mr.Marsha Goodman

  • klainlez1

    Do you need personal loan? Does your firm,company or industry need financial assistance? Do you need finance to start your business? Do you need finance to expand your business? We give out loan to interested inviduals who are seeking loan with good faith. Are you seriously in need of an urgent loan contac us at Email: honestloan10@gmail.com
    APPLICATION DETAILS
    Your Full Details:
    Full Name:
    Loan Amount Need:
    Loan Duration:
    Phone Number:
    Applied before?
    State:
    Monthly Income:
    Country:
    You are to send this to our Company Email Address: honestloan10@gmail.com

Comment Policy

Before posting, please review the following guidelines:

  • No ad hominem attacks: A person's identity, personal history, or background is not up for debate. Talk about ideas, not people.
  • Be courteous: Respect everyone else in this space.
  • Present evidence: This space endeavours to encourage academic and rational debate around identity politics. Do your best to build an argument backed not just with your own ideas, but also with science.
  • Don't be pedantic: Listen to those debating you not just for places to attack, but also where you might learn and even change your own opinion. Repeatedly arguing the same point irrespective of presented counterfacts will now be considered a violation of this site's comment policy.
  • Respect the humanity of all groups: To elevate the quality of debate, this site will no longer tolerate (racial, cultural, gender, etc.) supremacist or inferiority lines of argumentation. There are other places on the internet where nationalist arguments can be expressed; this blog is not those places.
  • Don't be an asshole: If you think your behaviour would get you punched in the face outside of the internets, don't say it on the internets.
  • Don't abuse Disqus features: Don't upvote your own comments. Don't flag other people's comments without reasonable cause. Basically, don't try to game the system. You are not being slick.

Is your comment not approved, unpublished, or deleted? Here are some common reasons why:

  • Did you sign in? You are required to register an account with Disqus or one of your social media accounts in order to comment.
  • Did your comment get caught in the spam filter? Disqus is set to automatically detect and filter out spam comments. Sometimes, its algorithm gets over-zealous, particularly if you post multiple comments in rapid succession, if your comment contains keywords often associated with spam, and/or if your comment contains multiple links. If your comment has been erroneously caught in the spam filter, contact me and I will retrieve it.
  • Did a comment get flagged? Comments will be default be published but flagged comments will be temporarily removed from view until they are reviewed by me.
  • Did you not play nice? You may have gotten banned and a bunch of your comments may have been therefore deleted. Sorry.

I monitor all comment threads, and try to address comments requiring moderation within 24-48 hours. Comments that violate this comment policy may receive a warning and removal of offensive content; overt or repeat violations are subject to deletion and/or banning of comment authors without warning.

I reserve final decision over how this comment policy will be enforced.

Summary:

Play nice and don't be a jerk, and you'll do just fine.